Relevance of the research topic. Agricultural topics in research work have never lost their relevance, regardless of the nature and intensity of the processes in the field of state development at various stages of national history. This can be fully explained by the close relationship between agrarian relations and politics. In this context, the traditions of rural everyday life, economic and household rituals, without which it is impossible to imagine the functioning of the entire rural organism and which not only reflect in themselves, but are themselves at the same time a reflection of the production activities of the peasant population, become important.

At the beginning of the 20th century, the peasants were assigned a primary role in the revival of the state power of Russia, despite the fact that the agrarian sector itself, due to the protracted crisis, required recovery and stabilization. The spread of capitalist relations in the countryside has made its own adjustments to the integral elements of rural life that meet the requirements of that time, therefore, modern reforms are also able to change the external appearance and inner world of farmers, to influence their mentality, although stable pragmatism has developed in them a traditionally cautious perception of transformative impulses from side of power. Today, this factor has led to a scientific interest in the study of the peasantry in a historical retrospective, an appeal to the rich experience of household everyday traditionalism and rituals accumulated by many previous generations. They are an important part of the culture and expression of one of the major groups Russian society- manufacturers of agricultural products. Traditions, customs and rituals are associated with the continuity of generations, they consist of many rituals and actions, include many components that make it possible to judge the features of the social and economic development rural population. The practical significance of the relevance of the topic is supported by an appeal to the everyday life of the peasants of a particular Stavropol province, into which elements of everyday life and economic traditions from other Russian regions were introduced and adapted in the process of colonization of the Ciscaucasia. In addition, traditions, customs and rituals are a fairly conservative phenomenon that does not have increased dynamism, but retains its origins and motives in the field of ideas about the world around us, the formation of a people's worldview and worldview.

The study of rural traditions and rituals seems important and relevant due to the fact that many of their elements have now been lost or are in a latent state due to the lack of proper conditions for manifestation and actualization. In this regard, there is a need to restore and preserve their form and content in the form in which they existed at the beginning of the last century, i.e. exactly one hundred years ago. Their qualitative characteristics will make it possible to judge the effectiveness and methods of functioning of all household and cultural mechanisms in the countryside.

Consideration of the agricultural problems of the southern Russian regions, including Stavropol, is devoted to a sufficient number of works, but most of them are focused on solving production, economic and management issues. In our opinion, not enough attention is paid to the inner world of the peasant, formed over thousands of years on the basis of traditions, customs and rituals. The time and level of social development require filling these gaps through the prism of analyzing the general trends in the formation of the identity of the peasants, in particular, at the regional level. The beginning of the 20th century was chosen as the period of study, because it was at this time that fundamental changes were noted in economic, everyday and worldview values ​​among the peasant population of the main grain-producing regions of the country.

The degree of scientific development of the problem. The historical stages in the development of various aspects of the economic and everyday life of the rural population are traditionally among the most popular trends in historical science. We have traditionally divided the bibliographic literature on the problem under study into three main periods: pre-Soviet, Soviet and post-Soviet. Within each of them, the works are distributed according to the problem-chronological principle. It should be noted that familiarity with publications of a general historical nature by K.N. Tarnovsky, A.A. Nikonova, V.O. Klyuchevsky,1 as well as with the works of historians, which summarize all the components of rural life, including in the region of interest to us.2

The first period includes works written the day before, during or immediately after the end of the period under consideration. As a rule, they do not differ in deep analysis, but contain valuable factual material that was directly perceived by their authors and reflected real events from everyday rural life. In the second period, the works of Soviet researchers were published, a characteristic feature of which was the desire to show the unproblematic progressive development of agriculture, the equal position of collective farmers in the social structure of the state, the complete eradication of any outdated traditions, superstitions and other views not characteristic of Soviet people. Research, articles and publications of the third period,

1 Tarnovsky K.N. Socio-economic history of Russia. Beginning of XX century. - M., 1990.; Nikonov A.A. The spiral of a centuries-old drama. Agrarian science and politics of Russia (XVIII-XX centuries). - M., 1995.; Klyuchevsky V.O. Russian history. Full course of lectures. - Minsk-Moscow, 2000.; The population of Russia in the XX century. - M.: ROSSPEN, 2000.

2 Picturesque Russia. T. IX. - St. Petersburg, 1893.; Culture and life of the peoples of the North Caucasus. - M., 1968.; to political, economic and cultural development peoples of the North Caucasus. - Stavropol, 1969.; Our land: documents, materials (1777-1917). - Stavropol, 1977.; History of the mountain and nomadic peoples of the North Caucasus in the 19th - early 20th centuries. - Stavropol, 1980.; History of the peoples of the North Caucasus (late XVIII - 1917). - M., 1988.; Materials for the study of the Stavropol Territory. - Stavropol, 1988.; The peasantry of the North Caucasus and the Don in the period of capitalism. - Rostov-on-Don, 1990.; New pages in the history of the fatherland. Based on the materials of the North Caucasus//Interuniversity collection of scientific articles. -Stavropol, 1996.; History of the Stavropol Territory from ancient times to 1917. - Stavropol: SKIPKRO, 1996.; Our Stavropol Territory: Essays on History / Scientific ed. A.A. Kudryavtsev, D.V. Kochura, V.P. Neva. - Stavropol: Shat-gora, 1999, which lasts from the beginning of the 1990s to the present, clearly marked a critical and deeper approach to the problem of peasant everyday life. They made important conclusions, in particular, that rural tradition and rituals are an integral part of rural life and are directly related to the socio-political conditions of the existence of the peasant population.

In the first period, the natural interest of scientists concentrated on the problems of developing a new type of relationship in the countryside. It is noteworthy that the main attention was paid specifically to the peasant type of farms and the issues of organizing production in the conditions of traditional communal land use were covered mainly. This is confirmed by the works of V. Prugavin, A.A. Karelina and others. With time and the development of the agricultural sector, the spectrum of scientific interest has also changed. Researchers paid attention not only to the characteristics and specific elements of the era, but also compared established and new forms, as well as types of activities of peasants. On this basis, they summed up and determined the level of their economic evolution,4 singled out the obvious impact of the reforms being carried out on the behavior of peasants in everyday life and society. This is clearly demonstrated in the work of B.R. Frommett.5 It is important to recognize the fact that the rural way of life and the traditions of managing were certainly associated with the disclosure of the directions of the activity of the rural community. They are described in sufficient detail in the publications of K. Golovin, N.N. Zvorykina, P. Veniaminova.6 However, at the beginning of the new century, the need arose to revise the peasant question in relation to the changed conditions of its development. Characteristics of the components

3 Prugavin V. Russian land community. - M.: Typolitography, 1888.; Karelin A.A. Communal ownership in Russia. - St. Petersburg: Publishing house A.S. Suvorina, 1893.; Land ownership and agriculture. - M.: Tipolitography, 1896.

4 Chernenkov N.N. To the characteristics of the peasant economy. Issue. I. - M .: Typolitography, 1905 .; Khalyutin P.V. Peasant farming in Russia. T. III. - St. Petersburg: Printing house of AO, 1915.

5 Frommetg B.R. Peasant cooperation and public life. - St. Petersburg: Publishing House "Thought", 1917.

6 Golovin K. Rural community. - St. Petersburg: Printing house of M.M. Stasyulevich, 1887.; Zworykin N.N. rural community. - M.: Typolitography, 1902.; Veniaminov P. Peasant community. - St. Petersburg: A. Benke Printing House, 1908. At first, G.A. Evreinov, and after him V.D. Kuzmin-Karavaev, N.P. Druzhinin and M. Oshanin filled them with concrete content. general about the Russian people, the factors of its socio-economic evolution, demographic, national and cultural characteristics which are convincingly and objectively shown by A. Corinthsky. Adler, Ya.V. Abramova, N.V. Chekhov.10

In terms of considering this topic, the works of regional researchers turned out to be very useful, who tried to analyze the most diverse aspects of the agrarian development of the North Caucasian region and its individual territories during the formation of capitalist relations and show peasant everyday life against this background within the framework of established household traditions. N.N. Zabudsky, V.E. Postnikova, G.N. Prozritelev.11 The contribution of the latter to the development of problems historical development region, the denominator is that he paid great attention to the Stavropol province, various aspects of the life of the Stavropol

1 h peasants, including their way of life and customs. The Stavropol region also attracted other researchers: K. Zapasnik, M. Smirnov, I.N. Kokshaisky, but they

7 Evreinov G.A. The peasant question in its modern formulation. - St. Petersburg: Printing house A. Benke, 1903.

8 Kuzmin-Karavaev V.D. Land and village. - St. Petersburg: Public Benefit, 1904 .; Druzhinin N.P. Essays on a peasant public life. - St. Petersburg: Typolitography, 1905.; Oshanin M. A book for a peasant. - St. Petersburg: Printing house of the "Rural Bulletin", 1910.

9 Corinthian A. People's Rus'. - M.: Publishing house M.V. Klyukina, 1901.

10 Russian folk holidays and superstitious rites. Issue. I. - M .: University Printing House, 1837 .; Adler B.F. The emergence of clothing. - St. Petersburg: Typolitography, 1903.; Abramov Ya.V. Our Sunday Schools. - St. Petersburg: Printing house of M. Merkushev, 1900.; Chekhov N.V. Public education in Russia. - M.: Typolitography, 1912.

11 Zabudsky N.N. Review of the Caucasian region. Ch.Sh. - Stavropol, 1851.; Postnikov V.E. South Russian peasant economy. - M.: Typolitography, 1891.; Prozritelev G.N. From the past of the North Caucasus. - Stavropol: Printing house of the Provincial Board, 1886.

12 Prozritelev G.N. Stavropol province in historical, economic and domestic terms. 4.II. - Stavropol, 1920. covered mainly issues of the economic and financial sphere. Unfortunately, the problem of research in these works is not presented so expressively, but it has found a deeper reflection in the works of A. Tvalchrelidze and E. Yakhontov,14 as well as in the works of A. Semilutsky, P. Ternovsky, I. Borodin, A. Bubnov, S. Velsky, N. Ryabykh, who described not only everyday work and traditional activities, but also the social and living conditions of the Stavropol peasants in specific settlements. characteristic of the entire Russian population of the study period.16

IN Soviet period interest in issues related to the topic of research has not decreased, however, approaches to considering the problem of organizing the economic and everyday life of peasants have become different. At an early stage of socialist transformations, scientists such as Yu. Larin and V.G. Tan-Bogoraz, made attempts to compare the state of peasant farms with the pre-revolutionary period, highlight

17 the emergence of new elements in the life of rural residents. V.A. Murin, trying to cover a wide range of issues of peasant life, special attention

13 Reserve K. Farm. - Stavropol, 1909 .; Smirnov M. Essay on the economic activity of the Stavropol province by the end of the 19th century. - Stavropol: Printing house of Guber of a certain Board, 1913 .; Kokshaisky I.N. The evolution of the economic life of the Stavropol province during 1880-1913. -Saratov: Printing house of the Society of Printers, 1915.

14 Tvalchrelidze A. Stavropol province in statistical, geographical, historical and agricultural relations. - Stavropol: Caucasian Library, 1897.; Yakhontov E. Native land. Stavropol province. - Stavropol: Printing house of the Provincial Board, 1911.

15 Semilutsky A. Safe Village//Collection of materials for the description of localities and tribes of the Caucasus. Issue. 23. - Tiflis: Printing house of the Main Directorate of the Viceroy of the Caucasus, 1881 .; Semilutsky A. The village of the Pokoinoye//Collection of materials for describing the localities and tribes of the Caucasus. Issue. 23. - Tiflis, 1897.; Ternovsky P. The village of Chernolesskoye//Collection of materials for the description of localities and tribes of the Caucasus. Issue. 1. - Tiflis, 1881.; Borodin I. Historical and statistical description p. Hope. - Stavropol: Printing house of the Provincial Board, 1885 .; Bubnov A. The village of Raguli//Collection of materials for the description of localities and tribes of the Caucasus. Issue. 16. - Tiflis, 1893.; Belsky S. The village of Novo-Pavlovka//Collection of materials for the description of localities and tribes of the Caucasus. Issue. 23. - Tiflis, 1897.; Ryabykh N. The village of Novogeorgievskoye//Collection of materials for the description of localities and tribes of the Caucasus. Issue. 23. - Tiflis: Printing house K.P. Kozlovsky, 1897.

16 Russian superstitions. - M., 1876.; Mysterious charms. - M., 1876.; Maksimov S.V. Unclean, unknown and cross power. - St. Petersburg, 1903.

1 Larin Yu. Issues of the peasant economy. - Moscow, 1923.; Tan-Bogoraz V.G. Old and new life. - Leningrad, 1924.

1 8 devoted to the life and customs of rural youth, and Ya. Yakovlev and M. Phenomenov made a detailed picture of rural life, evenly distributing their attention to the economic activities of the peasants and their daily needs. Both spheres of rural life are reflected by them not separately, but in close connection with each other.19

Later, when the vast majority of the peasant population became collective farmers and was elevated to the rank of social support of power in the countryside, in accordance with the doctrine of state development, it could not have vestiges of the past, which included traditions, customs of ancestors and rituals of rural holidays and everyday life. They were replaced by the politicized values ​​of socialist culture. All information about the countryside and the rural population was based mainly around the advantages of managing under socialism, which were highlighted against the backdrop of unsuccessful attempts to capitalize the agrarian sector before the revolution. which reflects the traditional foundations of social structure and communal land use, as well as issues related to changes in rural life under the influence of external socio-political conditions.

In this regard, the works of A. Posnikov, A.M.

Anfimova, P.N. Zyryanov. As already noted, in the Soviet period, the characterization of the peasantry was based mainly on the laws of the class struggle, but to avoid the need to resort to

18 Murin V.A. Life and customs of rural youth. - Moscow, 1926.

19 Yakovlev Ya. Our village. New in old and old in new. Ed. 3rd. - M.-L., 1925.; Phenomenov M.Ya. Modern village. In 2 volumes - M., 1925.

20 Khromov P.A. Economic development of Russia. - M.: Nauka, 1967.; Features of the agrarian system in Russia during the period of imperialism. - M., 1962.; Essays on the history of the USSR 1861-1904. - M .: State educational and pedagogical publishing house, I960 .; Anfimov A.M. Land lease in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century. - M., 1961.; Dubrovsky S.M. Agriculture and the peasantry of Russia in the period of imperialism. - M.: Nauka, 1975.; Kovalchenko ID Socio-economic structure of the peasant economy of European Russia in the era of capitalism. - M.: MGU, 1988.

21 Economy and life of Russian peasants. - M.: Soviet Russia, 1959.; Posnikov A. Communal land tenure. - Odessa: Ulrich and Schulze Printing House, 1978.; Anfimov A.M., Zyryanov P.N. Some features of the evolution of the Russian peasant community in the post-reform period / / History of the USSR. - 1980. - No. 4.; Anfimov A.M. Peasant economy of European Russia. (1881-1904) - M .: Nauka, 1980 .; Anfimov A.M. The economic situation and the class struggle of the peasants of European Russia. (1881-1904) - M., 1984. Scientists still did not succeed in originality of its historical development, which is a confirmation of the interconnection and interdependence of all aspects of rural life. In this regard, some typical problems for her were revealed in the plane of real everyday life. Rural traditions, rituals, customs, norms of behavior and forms of communication, the culture of the Russian peasantry became the subject of research by S.M. Dubrovsky, M.M. Gromyko and T.A. Bernshtam.22 It is noteworthy that in the scientific works of the regional level in relation to the selected period, the theme of the economic evolution of the region and its population also dominated at first. For confirmation, it is enough to refer to the works of A.V. Fadeeva, V.P. Krikunova, A.I. Kozlova, Ya.A. Fedorova, V.N. Ratushniak and others. At the same time, these authors, in the framework of the analysis of agrarian relations in the North Caucasus, tried not to lose sight of the features of economic tradition and everyday life among local peasants, accumulated by generations and reflecting the problems of its social and cultural development.23 The same assessment deserves the disclosure of the main directions of transformations in agrarian sector and the position of the peasantry in the Stavropol region before the revolution S. Kuznitsky, JI. Mordovin, S.G. Ledenev, K.M. Kovalev, P.A. Shatsky,24 but still more valuable for

22 Dubrovsky S. M. Agriculture and peasantry in Russia during the period of imperialism. - M.: Nauka, 1975.; Gromyko M.M. Traditional norms of behavior and forms of communication of Russian peasants of the 19th century. - M.: Nauka, 1986.; Gromyko M.M. The culture of the Russian peasantry of the 18th - 19th centuries as a subject of historical research // History of the USSR. - 1987. - No. 3.; Gromyko M.M. Family and community in the traditional spiritual culture of Russian peasants of the 18th - 19th centuries // Russians: family and social life. - M.: Nauka, 1989.; Gromyko M.M. The world of the Russian village. - M., 1991.; Bernshtam T.A. Youth in the ritual life of the Russian community in the 19th - early 20th centuries. - L .: Nauka, 1988.

23 Fadeev A.V. Essays on the economic development of the steppe Ciscaucasia in the pre-revolutionary period. - M.: Nauka, 1957.; Fadeev A.V. Involvement of the North Caucasus in the economic system of post-reform Russia / History of the USSR. - 1959. - No. 6.; Krikunov V.P. Some questions of studying the economy of the highlanders, peasants and Cossacks / / Proceedings of the North Caucasian Scientific Center of the Higher School of Economics ( social Sciences). - 1976. - No. 3.; Kozlov A.I. At a historic turn. - Rostov-on-Don: RSU Publishing House, 1977.; Fedorov Ya.A. Historical ethnography of the North Caucasus. - M.: MSU, 1983.; Ratushnyak V.N. Agrarian relations in the North Caucasus in the late XIX - early XX century. - Krasnodar: Publishing House of the Kuban University, 1982 .; Ratushnyak V.N. Agricultural production of the North Caucasus in the late XIX - early XX century. - Rostov-on-Don, 1989.; Ratushnyak V.N. The development of capitalism in the agricultural production of the North Caucasus in the late XIX - early XX century. - Rostov-on-Don, 1989.

24 Kuznitsky S. Agrarian issue in the Stavropol province. - Stavropol: Publishing house of the Stavropol Provincial Land Department, 1920 .; Mordovia L. Communal land use and field farming in the Stavropol province//Collection of information about the North Caucasus. T. 12. - Stavropol: Provincial Printing House, 1920 .; Ledenev S.G. Economic review of the Stavropol province. - Stavropol: Gubizdat Printing House, 1924 .; Kovalev K.M. Past and present of the peasants of Stavropol. - Stavropol: this study should be recognized as a work with an analysis of the social components of the life of the North Caucasian peasants. The authors of these works focused on the traditions of social and family life of peasants, clothing, ritual complexes of holidays, annual and seasonal production cycles. With regard to the East Slavic population as a whole, N.I. Lebedeva, V.I. Chicherov, V.K. Sokolova, G.S. Maslova, T.A. Listova. Festive and family rituals and customs of the North Caucasian and Stavropol peasantry were studied by L.V. Berestovskaya, V.V. l/

Sapronenko, T.A. Nevskaya, M.P. Ruban, Ya.S. Smirnova and others.

The works of the authors of the third period, which highlight the issues of changes in the economic and everyday life of peasants in the era of capitalism, are distinguished by the concretization of facts and events that give an objective idea of ​​the processes that took place in the rural environment, the prerequisites and factors for the formation of views and inner convictions. As when considering the first two periods in the development of historiography, it is first necessary to single out the general historical publications of V.A. Fedorova, E.N. Zakharova, M.N. Zueva, A.N. Sakharov and others with a description of the era, population and agrarian development of the country.27 Along with the economic regional book publishing house, 1947.; Shatsky P.A. The development of commercial animal husbandry in the Stavropol province in the 70-90s of the XIX century // Collection of works of the Pedagogical Institute. Issue. IX. - Stavropol: Stavropol book publishing house, 1955.

25 Lebedeva N.I. Russian peasant clothing XIX - early XX century.//Soviet ethnography. - 1956. - No. 4.; Lebedeva N.I. Peasant clothing of the population of European Russia. - M.: Soviet Russia, 1971.; Chicherov V.I. winter period Russian folk agricultural calendar of the 16th - 19th centuries. - M.: AN SSSR, 1957.; Holidays in the countryside. - M.: Soviet Russia, 1958.; Russian folk wedding ceremony. - L .: Nauka, 1978 .; Sokolova B.K. Spring-summer calendar rites of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians. - M.: Nauka, 1979.; Sokolova B.K. Calendar holidays and ceremonies Yutnography of the Eastern Slavs. - M., 1987.; Maslova G.S. Folk clothes in East Slavic traditional customs and rituals of the 19th - early 20th centuries. - M.: Nauka, 1984.; Russians: family and social life. - M.: Nauka, 1989.; Listova T.A. Russian rituals, customs and beliefs associated with the midwife / / Russians: family and social life. -M., 1989.

26 Berestovskaya L.V. On holidays and weekdays. - Stavropol: Stavropol book publishing house, 1968.; Sapronenko V.V. To the question of the state of Orthodox beliefs of the peasants of Stavropol in pre-revolutionary times / / Scientific notes. Some issues of Caucasian studies. Issue. I. - Stavropol, 1971.; Nevskaya T.A. Traditional and modern wedding of the rural population of Stavropol / / Soviet ethnography. - 1982. - No. 1.; Ruban M.P. Problems of rural life//Izvestiya SKNTsVSH. - 1979. - No. 2.; Smirnova Ya.S. Family and family life of the peoples of the North Caucasus. - M.: Nauka, 1983.; Problems of social life and life of the peoples of the North Caucasus in the pre-revolutionary period. - Stavropol: SGPI, 1985.

27 History of Russia XIX - early XX century / Ed. V.A. Fedorova. - M.: Zertsalo, 1998.; Zakharova E.N. History of Russia XIX - early XX century. - M.: Mnemozina, 1998.; History of Russia / Ed. M.N. Zueva. - M.: Higher economic aspects of rural history, researchers began to pay more attention to the direct producers of agricultural products - the peasants, the traditional forms of their interaction within the community. At the same time, in the field of view of K. Kavelin, L.I. Kuchumova, V.P. Danilova, P.S. Kabytov also got into the sphere of everyday life of peasants, since communal farming over time developed in them many stereotypes of behavior in everyday life, communication with people around them, perception of various events and phenomena. I.A. Yakimova singled out mercy as a traditional feature of the peasantry and, with actual examples, confirmed its readiness to help those who need it. reviewed by A.V. Markovsky in relation to the farms of southern Russia.31 While studying the history of the peasantry and the agricultural development of the country, scientists did not lose sight of the problems of rural tradition, cultural, domestic and spiritual aspects of the development of the Russian peasantry, customs, rituals and rituals associated with the family, holidays and other significant events. Their detailed description is given in the works and articles of M.Ya. Zadorozhnoy, I.O. Bondarenko, V.I. Dahl, I.P. Sakharova, Yu.S. Ryabtseva, V.N. Laushina, S.I. Dmitrieva, N.S. Polishchuk, L.A. Tultseva, L.N. Chizhikova, V. Chetverikov, V. Propp, V. Vardugin, N.V. Zorina, M. school, 2000.; The mentality and agrarian development of Russia (XIX-XX centuries) - M .: ROSSPEN, 1996 .; History of Russia from the beginning of the 18th to the end of the 19th century / Ed. A.N. Sakharov. - M.: ACT, 2001.

28 Kavelin K. A look at the Russian rural community//Dialogue. -1991. - No. 11.; Kuchumova L.I. Rural community in Russia. - M.: Significance, 1992.; Danilova V.P. Peasant mentality and community//Mentality and agrarian development of Russia (XIX-XX). Materials of the international conference. - M., 1996.; Kabytov P.S. Russian peasantry. - M.: Thought, 1998.

29 Yakimova I.A. Mutual help and mercy traditional features communal mentality of the Russian peasantry in the XIX - early XX centuries.//Mercy and charity in the Russian provinces. - Yekaterinburg, 2002.

30 Kazaresov V. Formation of the peasant economy//Questions of Economics. -1991. - No. 6.; Vinogradsky V. Russian peasant yard // Volga. - 1995. - No. 2, 3,4,7,10.

31 Markovsky A.V. Peasant economy of southern Russia. - St. Petersburg: Typography of the City Administration, 1990. t

Zabylina, F.S. Kapitsa, A. Bobrov. The above-named authors highlighted those aspects of peasant everyday life that clearly demonstrated its evolutionary nature, stability, pointed to the existence of the same type of worldview in rural areas.

The most valuable for the present work were studies devoted to the agricultural development of the North Caucasian region and Stavropol, in particular, in the period of interest to us. First of all, attention was drawn to the works of T.A. Nevsky, S.A. Chekmenev, V.P.

Nevsky, V.M. Kabuzan, in which historical plots unfold around the economic, everyday and spiritual traditions of the peasant population. Interesting information about the daily worries of the village is presented in the publications of A.E. Bogachkova, A.I. Krugova, I.M. Zubenko and others on the history of the Stavropol Territory, its districts and individual settlements.34 Interest in rural everyday life and rituals is confirmed by the fact that some aspects of the problem of interest to us are contained in dissertations defended recently.35 Analysis of the historiographic literature testifies

32 Zadorozhnaya M.Ya. Folk and Orthodox-Christian holidays. -M.: Knowledge, 1991.; Bondarenko I.O. Holidays of Christian Rus'. - Kaliningrad, 1993.; Dal V.I. About beliefs, superstitions and prejudices of the Russian people. - SPb., 1994.; Sakharov I.P. Tales of the Russian people. People's Diary. Holidays and customs // Encyclopedia of superstitions. - M., 1995.; Ryabtsev Yu.S. Family life of peasants//Teaching history at school. - 1996. - No. 8.; Laushin V.N. Ah, this wedding. - St. Petersburg: Lan, 1997.; Traditional dwelling of the peoples of Russia: XIX - early XX century. - M.: Nauka, 1997.; Dmitrieva S.I. Folk beliefs//Russian. - M., 1997.; Polishchuk N.S. The development of Russian holidays / URussian. - M.: Nauka, 1997.; Tultseva L.A. Calendar holidays and rituals//Russian. - M.: Nauka, 1997.; Chizhikova L.N. Russian-Ukrainian border. - M.: Nauka, 1998.; Chetverikov V. Word about the Russian hut//Far East. - 1998. - No. 7.; Our traditions. Baptism, wedding, burial, fasting. - M.: Bookman, 1999.; Propp V. Russian agricultural holidays. - M.: Labyrinth, 2000.; Vardugin V. Russian clothes. - Saratov: Children's Book Publishing House, 2001.; Zorin N.V. Russian wedding ritual. - M.: Nauka, 2001.; Zabylin M. Russian people: its customs, traditions, rituals. -M.: EKSMO Publishing House, 2003.; Kapitsa F.S. Slavic traditional beliefs, holidays and rituals.

M.: Nauka, 2003.; Bobrov A. Russian calendar for all times. Memorable dates, holidays, rituals, name days. - M.: Veche, 2004.

33 Nevskaya T.A. Chekmenev S.A. Stavropol peasants. Essays on economy, culture and life. - Min-Water: Publishing House "Caucasian health resort", 1994 .; Nevskaya V.P. Spiritual life and enlightenment of the peoples of Stavropol in the XIX - early XX centuries. - Stavropol: SGPI, 1995.; Kabuzan V.M. The population of the North Caucasus in the XIX-XX centuries.

St. Petersburg: Publishing house "BLITZ", 1996.

34 Bogachkova A.E. History of the Izobilnensky district. - Stavropol: Stavropol book publishing house, 1994.; Krugov A.I. Stavropol Territory in the history of Russia. - Stavropol: Stavropolservisshkola, 2001.; History of cities and villages of Stavropol. - Stavropol: Stavropol book publishing house, 2002.; Stavropol village: in people, figures and facts / Ed. THEM. Zubenko. - Stavropol: Stavropol book publishing house, 2003.

35 Kaznacheev A.V. Development of the North Caucasian outskirts of Russia (1864-1904)//Avtoref. diss. doc. ist. Sciences. - Pyatigorsk, 2005.; Kornienko T.A. The social everyday life of the population of the North Caucasus in years I shows that the problem of household traditions, holiday and calendar customs, rites and rituals is really relevant and attracts the attention of researchers. At the same time, there are still many unresolved issues in this area that need to be considered in order to create an objective and, if possible, complete picture of rural everyday life in the Stavropol Territory at the beginning of the 20th century.

The object of the study is the household, religious and family traditions, customs and rituals of rural everyday life and holiday cycles in the Stavropol Territory at the beginning of the 20th century.

The subject of the study is the features, prerequisites and factors of the formation of traditions in the sphere of management and material culture, sustainable habits of behavior in everyday life, related religious, family and holiday rites and customs; the meaning, conditions and procedure for performing ritual actions during family celebrations. The subject also includes the seasonal rituals of rural residents, timed to coincide with religious and folk holidays, its origins, common and special features, connection and interdependence with the socio-economic factors of peasant everyday life.

Purpose and objectives of the study. The purpose of this work is to present, on the basis of an analysis of documentary sources, archival and field materials, statistical data, a holistic description of the origins and state of rural everyday traditionalism, festive and calendar rituals, to identify their dynamics, regional characteristics, conditionality and dependence on trends in the development of worldviews. ideas, social relations and public sentiments among the peasant population of Stavropol at the beginning of the 20th century. Based on the goal and taking into account the degree of scientific world war / / Diss. cand. ist. Sciences. - Armavir, 2001.; Salny A.M. Stavropol village: the experience of historical and agricultural research (XIX - XX centuries) / / Diss. cand. ist. Sciences. - Stavropol, 2003.; Khachaturyan I.V. Stavropol peasants in the second half of the 19th - early 20th century: the experience of socio-cultural transformation (on the example of Primanychie) / / Avtoref. diss. cand. ist. Sciences. - Pyatigorsk, 2005. The development of the problem, its scientific and social significance, the following tasks were set for the study: to analyze and summarize the existing historiographical complex of literature, to determine the contribution and significance of the experience of regional developments, including those related to the subject of this study, for accounting and use in comprehensive study of the problem; to consider the state and influence of the economic policy of the tsarist government on the change in economic traditions in the Stavropol villages during the period under study; using archival materials, highlight the mechanisms and features of the implementation of the functions of self-government in the countryside in line with the problem under consideration; on the basis of documentary sources, trace the specifics, dynamics and trends in the development of the material and everyday culture of peasants, identify the originality of the conditions of their life; show the results of the influence of worldview stereotypes on the development of typical ideas about the world around us, the use of the experience of centuries-old observations in the economy and everyday life; substantiate the impact of spiritual traditions on the daily life of the rural population, its economic activity, determine the place and significance of church rituals and religious prejudices for the organization and management of the economy; to characterize and evaluate the arrangement of the family and everyday life of peasants, to highlight the content and purpose of festive rites, customs and rituals associated with family celebrations and significant events.

The chronological scope of the study is limited to the first decade of the 20th century, during which the formation of the structure of the rural population of Stavropol was essentially completed, where capitalist relations were actively spreading at that time. They gave a new impetus to the development of agricultural production, made changes to the economic traditions of the peasants, but did not affect the state and content of everyday life and the festive and calendar rituals accumulated by many generations.

The territorial scope of the study is limited to the Stavropol province within the boundaries as of the study period, when the majority of the population lived in rural areas and, despite belonging to people from different regions of the country, was a fairly organized social community with common views and beliefs, in a special way life and specific form self-expression.

The methodological and theoretical basis of the dissertation research was a retrospective analysis of the formation in the peasant environment of stereotypical ideas about the world around us and its impact on people, as a result of which the peasants developed stable traditions in the economic sphere, customs of life and leisure activities, expressed in various rites and rituals. The results of such an analysis made it possible to establish the interdependence of all spheres of life of the rural population, the conditionality of the subject of research by regional characteristics and the socio-economic situation of the peasants.

On the basis of the work plan and in accordance with its purpose, the solution of the tasks set for the study was achieved by applying generally accepted principles scientific knowledge: historicism, objectivity and comprehensiveness, which form the most acceptable and effective model for a retrospective analysis of historical events and phenomena, allowing you to take into account the subjective factor, the psychological atmosphere in the countryside, and evaluate the processes under study in real conditions. In addition, they made it possible to use not only general scientific, but also special methods of historical knowledge.

When developing and covering the topic, problem-chronological, causal, structural-functional general scientific methods were actively used. With their help, the origins of rural tradition and rituals were revealed, their adaptation in the conditions of Stavropol in the context of its historical development was traced. If we talk about the benefits of special historical methods, then with the help of the historical-comparative method, a comparison was made of the characteristics of the subject of research in various settlements of the province. The historical-systemic method, the methods of diachronic and synchronous analysis, classification and periodization made it possible to trace the mechanisms for the implementation of traditional skills by peasants in production, to identify regional features of the formation of worldview attitudes, to classify rituals, to establish the order and sequence of performance by rural residents of household and religious rituals.

The source base of the study includes various types of written sources and field material. The most important group is archival sources that carry valuable historical information about the life of peasants in the region under study, the features of their management in the Stavropol Territory, production interaction within the rural community, specific features of everyday life and family relations, behavior at home, during festive events and significant events. . A comprehensive analysis of archival documentation made it possible to trace the prerequisites and conditions for the formation of typical views on rural everyday life among Stavropol peasants, to recreate a complete picture of economic, household, family and festive rituals, to highlight its regional features. Among the analyzed documentary funds of the central archival institutions is the fund 102 (Police Department of the Ministry of the Interior. 2nd record keeping) of the State Archives Russian Federation(GARF); fund 391 (Resettlement Administration), fund 1268 (Caucasian Committee) of the Russian State Historical Archive (RGIA).

In the State Archives of the Stavropol Territory (GASK), the following funds turned out to be the most saturated with the necessary materials: 3 (Kruglolessky stanitsa administration. Stanitsa Kruglolesskaya. 1847-1916), 46 (Stavropol district marshal of the nobility), 49 (Caucasian Chamber of Criminal and Civil Court), 58 (Stavropol provincial presence for peasant affairs), 68 (Stavropol provincial government), 80 (Stavropol provincial statistical committee), 101 (Office of the Stavropol civil governor), 102 (Stavropol provincial land management commission), 135 (Stavropol spiritual consistory), 188 (Stavropol Police Department), 398 (Stavropol District Court), 459 (Stavropol State Chamber), 806 (Volost Boards of the Stavropol Governorate).

The next group of sources included collections containing important documents on the period under study: legislative acts, decrees and government resolutions,36 as well as various notes, reports and

47 surveys of provincial officials. The same group of sources includes statistical publications, memorable books, collections of materials and information about the North Caucasus, issues of Caucasian calendars.38

Valuable sources were materials collected during conversations with residents of the villages of Serafimovskoye and Sadovoe, Arzgir district and the village

36 Russian legislation of the X-XX centuries. In 9 volumes - Moscow, 1988.; Council of Ministers of the Russian Empire. Documents and materials. - L., 1990.

37 The Most Submissive Note on the Administration of the Caucasus Region by Count Vorontsov-Dashkov. - St. Petersburg, 1907.; Reviews of the Stavropol province for 1900-1910. - Stavropol: Printing house of the Provincial Board, 19011911 .; Reports of the Stavropol Governor for 1900-1910. - Stavropol: Printing house of the Provincial Board, 1901-1911.

38 Collection of statistical information about the Stavropol province. - Stavropol, 1900-1910 .; Commemorative book of the Stavropol province for 1900. (1901-1909) - Stavropol: Printing house of the Provincial Board, 1900 (1901-1909).; Collection of materials for the description of localities and tribes of the Caucasus. Issue. 1, 16, 23, 36. - Tiflis: Printing house of the Main Directorate of the Viceroy of the Caucasus, 1880, 1893, 1897, 1906 .; The first general census of the population of the Russian Empire. 1897 Stavropol province. T. 67. - Stavropol: Edition of the Central Statistical Committee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1905 .; Collection of information about the North Caucasus. T. 1, 3, 5, 12. - Stavropol: Provincial Printing House, 1906, 1909, 1911, 1920 .; Statistical information about the state of secondary educational institutions of the Caucasian educational district for 1905. - Tiflis, 1905.; Statistical and economic studies of the resettlement management in 1893 - 1909. - SPb., 1910.; Lists of populated places in the Stavropol province. Collection of information about the North Caucasus. T. V. - Stavropol, 1911.

Zhuravsky, Novoselitsky district, Stavropol Territory. Regional periodicals published during the period under study were also used as sources. Among them are "Northern Caucasus", "Stavropol Provincial Gazette", "Stavropol Diocesan Gazette". These sources have largely contributed to the achievement of the goal and the solution of the tasks.

The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that it summarizes the experience of the life of the peasant population of a particular region - the Stavropol province, which includes not only the definition of established traditions in the economic sphere and in the field of social relations, but also a description of the way of life, worldview and worldview of the peasants, expressed in everyday and festive customs, ceremonies and rituals. This makes it possible to introduce new criteria for characterizing the peasantry of Stavropol: the creation of a multi-level structure of rural tradition by layering the experience of immigrants on local economic conditions; orientation in everyday life and in the industrial sphere to the perception and implementation of innovations dictated by the time; preservation of the features of nationality and identity in the material and spiritual culture and adherence to the ingrained norms of behavior in everyday life and in society. In addition to the introduction of previously unused source materials into circulation, the following provisions of the dissertation research have elements of novelty: it was established that traditions in the field of organization and management of the economy were based on the unity of peasant and state interests, and their strengthening in the conditions of Stavropol occurred due to the desire of rural residents to improve their living standards. level and well-being; It was suggested that the preservation of the role of the community in the Stavropol villages, despite the expansion of individualistic tendencies in the peasant environment, was facilitated by its multifunctionality. Unlike similar structures in other regions, the rural community on

Stavropol actively participated in solving not only economic, but also social, legal, moral and religious issues; the origins of worldview ideas among rural residents are revealed, the change in traditional household and spiritual values, which were created not only on the experience of generations, but also depended on the impact of external socio-political conditions, was traced. On this basis, a conclusion was drawn about the evolutionary nature of traditions, customs and rituals, their susceptibility to classification according to the signs of correspondence to various spheres of the life of the peasant population; the opinion was expressed that such an element of material culture as the organization of settlements was formed directly at the places of new residence of settlers, depending on the surrounding natural and climatic conditions, which led to the emergence of the traditions of the external design of villages, their layout and structure, characteristic of the Stavropol Territory. As for the arrangement of peasant dwellings and yards, in this matter there was a combination of customs established in the minds with local opportunities, as well as the economic, domestic and spiritual needs of the peasants; the whole process of agricultural production was closely connected with religion and cult representations in the countryside; together with the adherence of the peasants to centuries-old traditions, they formed their special attitude to the observance of seasonal calendar rituals. To a certain extent, this circumstance was a deterrent to economic evolution; the relationship of everyday, festive and family rituals and rituals with the mentality and moods of the peasants, their constant expectation and readiness to perceive the best changes in life is determined. Rituals and customs helped to preserve the moral attitudes that were passed down from generation to generation, to accumulate spiritual resources of life.

Defense provisions. Taking into account the results of solving the tasks set, the following provisions are put forward for defense: a distinctive feature of rural everyday life in the Stavropol Territory was the fact that the peasants who moved to the North Caucasus had practical experience of living in other socio-economic conditions, which in the new place was transformed into specific traditions of managing and organizing life ; stable traditions in production activities, in turn, contributed to the evolution of peasants' worldview ideas about the surrounding reality; household, spiritual and cultural traditions in the rural environment of Stavropol reflected the purpose of the rural community, relied on its strength and the desire for comprehensive participation in the daily life of peasants based on the principles of equality in organizing the activities of all rural mechanisms; the traditions of everyday life and material culture were formed in the Stavropol Territory through the adaptation of the peasant population to the conditions and environment. Their approval and preservation was largely facilitated by the increased degree of isolation of the Stavropol village in the economic and social structure of the state; rural tradition and everyday life, economic and everyday rituals, are an important factor in the functioning of the entire rural organism, they not only reflect in themselves, but at the same time are themselves a reflection of the production activities of the peasants; traditions, customs and rituals are associated with the continuity of generations, they consist of many rituals and actions, include many components that make it possible to judge the features of the social and economic development of the rural population; peasant traditions and rituals associated with them should be classified as fairly conservative phenomena that do not have increased dynamism, but retain their origins and motives in the field of ideas about the world around them, the formation of a popular worldview and worldview; the beginning of the 20th century refers to the period when not only well-established traditions and rituals were clearly manifested, but there were also changes in economic, everyday and worldview values ​​among the peasant population of the main grain-producing regions of the country.

The theoretical and practical significance of the work is determined by the social significance of the research problem, which consists in the fact that in the course of the analysis, elements of regional historical experience were used, which have the ability to adapt to the current situation. It also lies in the fact that the conclusions made in the dissertation are based on reliable data and the available achievements of domestic historical science in the development of the presented topic. The results obtained can serve as a basis for expanding and deepening interest in the field of everyday rural traditions and rituals, become an integral part of general training courses on the history of Russia and Stavropol, as well as special manuals on local history.

Testing and implementation of research results. The results of the study are presented in five scientific publications with a total volume of 2.4 p.l. The main provisions and conclusions of the dissertation were reported at regional, interuniversity and university conferences and seminars. The work was discussed and recommended for defense at a meeting of the Department of Social Sciences and Humanities of the Pyatigorsk State Technological University.

Dissertation structure. The subject, purpose and objectives of the study determined the structure of the dissertation. It consists of an introduction, three chapters, including two paragraphs each, a conclusion, notes, a list of sources and references.

CONCLUSION

The emergence and development of rural traditions in the Stavropol Territory had their own specific features, since here the domestic and economic aspects of life mutually acted on each other, and any change in one of them was necessarily reflected in the other. The soil and climatic conditions of the province determined the distribution of the peasant population between two main areas of activity: agriculture and animal husbandry. The list of economic crops traditional for the Stavropol region was formed on the basis of trial and error, through practical experience, which ultimately led to the expansion of sown areas at the beginning of the 20th century by almost 40% compared to the past century. Yields on black soil were higher than in central Russia, after harvesting, threshing began, which was most often carried out using livestock. Gradually, the peasants came to the conclusion that this method is suitable only for harvest years, when there was no need to conserve straw. In all other cases, threshing was done with flails or stone rollers. Peasants stored grain in barns with bins, which was much more convenient and practical than storage in earthen pits. The monotony in the use of the farming system had a downside. There was a more rapid depletion of arable land, especially since the fields were not fertilized. Grain stocks were created by the peasants solely through the expansion of "plowing". Transport communications in the province were poorly developed, as a result of which the price of bread was at a low level. Over time, agriculture in the Stavropol Territory became firmly established as a traditional occupation of the peasants; the whole life of the province was built on its development. The rural population was not engaged in gardening or horticulture. It preferred to buy vegetables and fruits or exchange them for wheat from the Kuban Cossacks. True, it is necessary to single out viticulture, which in the southeastern part of the province was a significant branch of horticulture in terms of development.

Along with agriculture, a significant role in the agricultural development of the Stavropol province was played by animal husbandry, without which the field economy itself could not be conducted normally. It was less dependent on weather conditions, therefore, it more reliably ensured the profitability of the peasant economy. Animal husbandry also contributed to the development of the sectors providing it, which had a positive effect on the overall dynamics of the economic development of the province and created conditions for the emergence and strengthening of new economic traditions. However, like agriculture, cattle breeding in the province has taken the path of extensive development. Its adaptation in the Stavropol Territory was facilitated by rich natural expanses with fodder grasses, which made it possible to produce working cattle and fatten meat breeds at the same time. But animal husbandry did not have the same pace of development everywhere. It spread most intensively in the farms of Novogrigorevsky and Aleksandrovsky districts, including the breeding of ordinary sheep.

Economic traditions in the province were largely determined by socio-economic reasons. At the beginning of the 20th century, under the influence of internal and external demand, the structure of crops underwent a restructuring towards an increase in market crops. The disadvantage of the prevailing grain system of field farming was their monotony, which caused more rapid depletion of land. Most of the rural population of the province in the period under review were immigrants, they brought with them the accumulated experience of land use, but not all of this experience was acceptable in completely different conditions. This circumstance became a factor in the creation of specific features of management in the Stavropol Territory, which, taking into account regular practical application, were transformed into stable traditions.

An equally significant source of traditions in the peasant environment was the social form of self-government, which in itself belongs to the traditional forms of existence of the rural population in Russia. It is noteworthy that in Russian conditions, the tradition in the field of social organization of the village was supplemented by the traditional characterization of the peasantry as the main bearer and custodian of the specific features of the Slavic cultural and historical type. In the Stavropol region, the long practice of communal land use has formed a stable tradition of constant readiness of peasants for mutual assistance. The essence of this tradition was that mutual assistance in the countryside at the level of public opinion was elevated to the rank of an honorable duty. No one, regardless of position and condition, had the right to refuse assistance to the peasants who needed it.

The main condition for the creation of a community in the province was not the number of owners, but their desire for the collective use of land and their readiness to give up privileges in matters of land use. It is known that, in addition to issues of taxation and regulation of land relations, the community at the legislative level was empowered to solve certain legal problems. At the same time, with the advent of the new century in Stavropol, the community began to play a prominent role in the administrative management of the village. Most often, in the rural communities of the Stavropol province, issues put on the agenda of gatherings were decided by a majority of votes. All decisions taken as a result of voting were recorded in order in the register of decisions. This became the basis on which traditional forms of relations between peasants and self-government bodies in the countryside were gradually formed.

The functions of the community in the Stavropol Territory extended not only to production activities, but also to all spheres of everyday life, the solution of social, cultural and spiritual issues. The peasant population did not have such needs that would not fall under the jurisdiction of the community. The traditional and at the same time socially significant area of ​​activity of the rural community was public education. As of the beginning of the 20th century, the main part of the Stavropol villages had schools for teaching children, the type of which was determined by the peasants themselves at the gathering. Judiciary was also one of the main functions of the rural community. It is noteworthy that the traditional powers of rural! communities in the Stavropol Territory also extended to the sphere of family relations.

In this sense, it performed an educational function, taking care of the moral state of its members.

Children, especially orphans and the disabled, have traditionally been the focus of community attention. Society allocated the required funds for their maintenance and strictly controlled their intended use. Thanks to the activities of the community, those rural traditions in economic, social, spiritual and everyday life were born and strengthened in the Stavropol Territory, which contributed to the preservation of the peasantry of their identity in the new conditions of life and activity. The functions of the Stavropol community were much broader than the powers of similar structures in other Russian regions. In our opinion, this is due to the specific position of the province and the special ethno-social environment. Being located next to representatives of the mountain and steppe peoples, the peasantry of Stavropol, having adopted * the positive foundations of their life, was nevertheless more oriented towards strengthening their own rural tradition. In addition, the Stavropol rural community, as a cumulative historical phenomenon, most often organized together with settlements and initially included people from various regions of Russia, who did not always have the same potential for economic and cultural and everyday experience. Nevertheless, thanks to the community, they all became representatives of a single social community of the Stavropol peasantry, which formed its own traditions that fully corresponded to the conditions of management and life.

Settlers from various Russian regions contributed their elements not only to the economic originality of the villages of Stavropol, but also to the settlement culture, which, in combination with local conditions, gave individual features to the peasant settlements in the province. However, with all the variety of the same type of elements, they still differed in the quantity and quality of economic structures, enterprises for the processing of raw materials. By the beginning of the 20th century, steam mills appeared here, but "windmills" for a long time remained the most convenient and affordable type of grain processing. At the same time, artesian wells became traditional objects of the rural landscape as a result of an acute shortage of water sources. Farms, which in local conditions were both a form of organization of production and a peculiar type of settlements, should also be attributed to the special features of the agrarian sphere of the Stavropol Territory. Particularly stable traditions among the peasants of Stavropol were observed in the field of village development, street planning and the location of houses, their equipment with various devices, for example, identical chimneys, regardless of the material of the entire structure.

The peasants gave priority to the construction of temples. The specificity of the external appearance of the Stavropol villages was that adobe construction prevailed here, accounting for over 80% of the total housing stock in rural areas. Front gardens, flower beds, flowerbeds in front of courtyards and a slender row of trees along their entire length should also be attributed to the distinctive features of rural streets.

Housing occupies a special place in the structure of traditional features of rural everyday life. It reveals the long-term functioning of traditions that were formed in various historical periods. One of the main types of dwellings of the rural population in the Stavropol province were huts: rectangular or oblong in shape, consisting of one, two or three rooms with an earthen floor. In Stavropol, the entrance to the house was usually made from the street, through the canopy. In each room, as a rule, it was planned to have two windows to the courtyard and to the street. Inside and outside the house in the Stavropol Territory was necessarily whitewashed. An indispensable attribute of a residential building was a room with icons in the front corner. The interior in the houses of the peasants did not differ in variety, but everything had its place and purpose. The rooms of a rural house were traditionally decorated on the walls with embroidered towels, and at the beginning of the 20th century, carpets appeared on the walls in wealthy families. Outbuildings in most cases consisted of premises for livestock, stocks of bread, hay and food. The barn was always in a prominent place in the yard , opposite the house. The floor in it was made of boards, barns were covered with reeds, and from the beginning of the 20th century - with iron. In the same period, peasants began to use wood, stone chips and tiles more widely in construction.

Traditional for the Stavropol region were not only the layout, location and arrangement, but also the type of settlements. Here, large villages were mainly created. As evidenced by the analysis of materials on the settlements of the Stavropol province, at the beginning of the 20th century they differed from each other in size, ethnic composition, size of allotment plots, profitability of agricultural production, etc. But in the way of life and way of life of the Stavropol villages there were also elements characteristic of the entire region, uniting all of them into one whole with | administrative, social, spiritual and other points of view.

The formed structure of the population and economic specialization became the basis of tradition, on which folk habits, customs, and mores were built, manifested in various rites and rituals. In the Stavropol region at the beginning of the 20th century, peasant farms dominated in the field of agrarian development. This was certainly reflected in the traditions and customs, which absorbed both the experience of previous generations and the innovations of the new era. The desire of the peasants for knowledge of the world developed in them a special susceptibility to various signs of the times, which took their place in a number of everyday needs. The people were imbued with the belief that depending on the will of higher powers, which left an imprint of religiosity on the entire complex of rural traditions. At the same time, outside the temple, there was another world with its own laws of real life. The difficult conditions of this world formed among the peasants a stable immunity to difficulties and a readiness to overcome them, which was reflected in the desire j to have patronage from above. It is no coincidence, therefore, that all production was associated with the hopes for the success of any undertaking. Before sowing, the seeds were consecrated, sometimes this was done at a special prayer service, after which religious processions were arranged on the fields. Livestock also became the object of cult influence. Traditionally, on the eve of the Epiphany, the peasants sprinkled it with "holy water". These and other examples testify to the fact that rural residents at the beginning of the 20th century tirelessly cared about the fulfillment of church traditions, but the nature of their beliefs was largely determined by the predominant type of economic activity. In this sense, common Slavic and local traditions are intricately intertwined in the Stavropol Territory. Among the farmers here, mother earth, the God of rain and Volos were revered. Rural rituals more reflected pre-Christian beliefs and gave their own flavor to everyday life. Belief in supernatural forces, omens and omens in most cases was based on the conditions of existence, although, of course, it was a reflection of primitive i ideas about the surrounding world. With its help, the weather was determined, the onset of rainy or happy times.

Rural everyday life obeyed religious canons only externally, from the inside it was free from them, which is confirmed by peasant clothing. Along with traditional bast shoes, ports and shirts, at the beginning of the 20th century, shirts with a yoke and blouses appeared under the influence of urban fashion. On their feet, the villagers began to wear chobots - half boots with pointed socks. But sundresses, which were previously worn at home by both sexes, have disappeared. Men replaced them with zipuns and caftans, women with summer coats. In other words, in the new century, the process of unifying the clothes of the peasants began. National traditions changed forms that arose under the influence of the image and conditions of household life, but they nevertheless appeared and strengthened in various decorations, ornaments, lace, and some elements of the peasant dress have survived to this day.

Speaking about the household everyday life of peasants, one cannot fail to note the peculiarities of their nutrition. In the kitchen, no less than in clothes, people's preferences, tastes and opportunities are reflected. Not only the menu was traditional, but the norms of behavior at the table, passed down from generation to generation. The basis of the food reserves of the peasants was bread and flour products: pies, buns, rolls, noodles, etc. Broths made from poultry meat are widely used in the Stavropol Territory. In autumn, the peasants often ate meat and prepared it for the winter: dried, salted. Thus, the traditions of the economic and everyday life of the Stavropol peasants absorbed the centuries-old experience of previous generations and changed on the basis of everyday experience in housing, clothing and food.

According to experts, the solemnity of festive rituals was significantly enhanced by the merger of popular mood and religious morality. In preparation, and even on the holiday itself, a person, as it were, was cleansed of all filth and fuss. He gave an assessment of his deeds and behavior, set up his inner world for further connection with the surrounding reality. At the beginning of the 20th century, noticeable changes were made in all areas of the life of the Russian people, including holidays closely associated with the winter and summer solstice, autumn and spring equinoxes. In the Slavic calendar, there are twelve great and big holidays a year, which have a pronounced cult character, but certainly include folk traditions. All holidays are cycles according to the seasons. So, after the New Year, the Slavic population celebrates Christmas and Epiphany. Christmas Eve - Christmas Eve - was accompanied by many signs and beliefs. All of them, one way or another, were connected with the main occupation of the peasants. This, in our opinion, is the essence of folk tradition, reflected in the festive rituals. Christmas time, or holy evenings that followed Christmas Eve, were perceived by the people as a period of anomalous phenomena with a mystical character. Divination was a constant companion of Christmas time. The Baptism of the Lord was primarily associated with cleansing from sins. Maslenitsa was the last winter holiday. Its meaning came entirely from the pagan era and consisted in seeing off the winter and waiting for the warmth of spring. Maslenitsa was celebrated for a week, and every day is filled with its own meaning. It precedes Great Lent and begins 56 days before Easter. In general, the winter holidays were held in the village more cheerfully than all the others. This was also explained by the fact that the peasants were not busy with economic work in winter and could devote themselves entirely to popular rejoicing. The Easter holiday cycle was entirely filled with Christian meaning about the atonement of human sins, so Easter rightfully belongs to the main Christian holidays. However, the peasants did not forget their farms either. On the first day of Easter, peasants poured grain bread into their bins with the hope of a rich harvest. On the third day of Easter, they gathered with several families, went to the steppe to their arable land. Even before Easter, during Lent, in addition to Palm Sunday, the Annunciation and Great Thursday were celebrated. This day was full of various ceremonies, which also included the collection of juniper and tatar, endowed with supposedly protective properties. Easter itself church calendar celebrated not earlier than April 4 and not later than May 8, but always on the first Sunday after the first full moon following the vernal equinox. Many folk signs are associated with its symbols. Miraculous properties were attributed not only to eggs, but also to the leaves of birch, onion and other plants, with which the peasants dyed them. On the tenth day after Easter, Radonitsa falls, when Orthodox people remembered the dead, visited their graves. No less significant church holiday was the Trinity - the birthday of the church. It marked the end of spring and was celebrated on the fiftieth day after Easter. In rural areas, the feast of the Trinity was invariably associated with hopes for a prosperous year. On Thursday, on the eve of the Trinity, the peasants celebrated i Semik - the veneration of water sources, which make it possible to grow a rich harvest. In the summer, a noteworthy holiday was the honoring of Ivan Kupala, and after him - the Intercession of the Most Holy Lady of the Virgin Mary. He completed the general holiday calendar.

In addition to traditional religious and folk holidays, the peasants on certain days especially revered the saints, who contributed to the successful completion of agricultural work. There were many such days, especially in spring and summer. Holidays were the cultural self-expression of the people, they united everyone, regardless of position and rank, contributed to the formation of common stereotypes, forms of behavior in everyday life, economic and everyday traditions.

The family has traditionally been the main economic unit, therefore, everyday traditions in the sphere of distribution of intra-family labor responsibilities serve as an important aspect of its characteristics. I Naturally, the role of men in their implementation exceeded women's participation, since the main criterion for evaluation was the share of work in the main agricultural occupations. The degree of employment of women was higher among married women, girls in the family of their parents performed auxiliary work. The peasant's wife was not his heiress and, in the event of her husband's death, acted as a guardian until the children came of age. However, unmarried men did not have equal status with independent owners; they were at the court of their father. Being an integral part of the rural community, the peasant family in the Stavropol Territory independently provided for its livelihoods. She was distinguished by the fact that she could consist of several married couples, but at the same time only her father was in charge of the household. An analysis of the way of life of a family of rural residents indicates that each of its elements was based on the beginning of labor, all family members performed household chores for family needs. The exception was needlework, which belonged to the female prerogative, j The process of raising children also took place in the course of work, at first they learned the main features of the peasant worldview: thrift, love of work. They were taught the rules of behavior on the street, at the table, in church. The head of the family took only his sons as his assistants, the girls helped their mother. The strict daily routine created ideal conditions for the establishment of stable customs and rituals within the framework of everyday life, the meaning of which was clearly manifested in the context of socio-economic relations. Therefore, the rite in most cases determined both the external forms and the internal content of peasant life. The most important due to the prevalence should be recognized as a complex of rites, ritual actions and beliefs associated with marriage and the increase in families due to natural fertility.

The farmer understood marriage as a moral duty, a guarantee of well-being and social prestige. Wedding rituals affected many aspects of life, were closely connected with the conditions of life and the peculiarities of the social i structure of society. The conclusion of marriage consisted of three stages: pre-wedding, wedding and post-wedding, which were accompanied by certain customs and rituals. Various amulets were used in the marriage ritual: onions, garlic, fishing net, woolen threads, needles, bells. It was customary for the Stavropol peasants to lay an egg under the feather bed for young people so that they would have children, for the same purposes they were fed chicken at the wedding. In order for a son to be born, the bride was put on the knees of boys at the wedding, and during childbirth, her husband's hat was placed on her head. The appearance of a child in a woman significantly strengthened her position. Not being a mother, she was considered punished by God for sins. Despite the solemnity of the birth, for forty days both the mother and the child were isolated for "cleansing". This attitude towards motherhood was associated with the belief that a woman during childbirth was balancing on the verge of life and death and was perceived as a person who had been in the next world. The peasant family and marriage in the Stavropol Territory acquired specific features characteristic only for this region. The family combined the properties of a social and economic structure, and the rituals associated with its activities were mainly rational and based on empirical knowledge, abounded in magical techniques and actions aimed at ensuring well-being and a happy future.

The analysis carried out makes it possible to say that a distinctive feature of rural everyday life in the Stavropol Territory was the fact that the peasants who moved to the North Caucasus had practical experience of living in other socio-economic conditions, which in a new place was transformed into specific traditions of managing and organizing life. Sustainable traditions in production activities, in turn, contributed to the evolution of peasants' worldview ideas about the surrounding reality.

Household, spiritual and cultural traditions in the rural environment of Stavropol reflected the purpose of the rural community, relied on its strength and the desire for comprehensive participation in the daily life of peasants based on the principles of equality in the organization of the activities of all rural mechanisms. The traditions of everyday life and material culture were formed in the Stavropol Territory through the adaptation of the peasant population to the conditions and environment. Their approval and preservation was largely facilitated by the increased degree of isolation of the Stavropol village in the economic and social structure of the state.

Rural tradition and everyday life, economic and household rituals, are an important factor in the functioning of the entire rural organism, they not only reflect in themselves, but at the same time are themselves a reflection of the production activities of the peasants. Traditions, customs and rituals are connected with the continuity of generations, they consist of many rituals and actions, include many components that make it possible to judge the features of the social and economic development of the rural population. Peasant traditions and rituals associated with them should be classified as fairly conservative phenomena that do not have increased dynamism, but retain their origins and motives in the field of ideas about the world around them, the formation of the people's worldview and worldview. The beginning of the 20th century refers to the period when not only well-established traditions and rituals were clearly manifested, but there were also changes in economic, everyday and worldview values ​​among the peasant population of the main grain-producing regions of the country.

1. Archival sources

2. State Archive of the Russian Federation (GARF). F. 102 - Police Department of the Ministry of the Interior. 2nd office work. Op. 74. D. 774.

3. Russian State Historical Archive (RGIA). F. 391 - Resettlement Administration. Op. 2. D. 802.

4. RGIA. F. 1268 Caucasian committee. Op. 2. D. 383.

5. State Archive of the Stavropol Territory (GASK). F. 3 - Kruglolesskoe stanitsa board. Station Kruglolesskaya. 18471916 Op. 1.D. 442.1294.

6. GASK. F. 46 Stavropol district leader of the nobility. Op. 1. D. 220.

7. GASK. F. 49 Caucasian Chamber of Criminal and Civil Court. Op. 1. D. 237,2025.

8. GASK. F. 58 Stavropol provincial presence for peasant affairs. On. 1. D. 160,255,295,424.

9. GASK. F. 68 Stavropol provincial government. On. 1. D. 6386, 7779.

10. GASK. F. 80 Stavropol Provincial Statistical Committee. Op. 1.D.61.

11. GASK. F. 101 Office of the Stavropol Civil Governor. On. 1. D. 1502.; Op. 4. D. 59, 85, 621, 1174, 1262, 1502, 1801,2980, 3059.

12. GASK. F. 102 Stavropol provincial land management commission. On. 1. D. 1,187,216.

13. GASK. F. 135 Stavropol Spiritual Consistory. Op. 35. D. 393.; Op. 47. D. 5.; Op. 48. D. 1.; Op. 50. D. 655.; Op. 60. D. I860.; Op. 63. D. 916.; Op. 64. D. 812.; Op. 65. D. I860.; Op. 68. D. 342.; Op. 70. D. 2598.

14. GASK. F. 188 Stavropol police department. On. 1. D. 411.

15. GASK. F. 398 Stavropol District Court. Op. 26. D. 224.

16. GASK. F. 459 Stavropol State Chamber. On. 1. D. 1975, 8779, 4433.

17. GASK. F. 806 Volost administrations of the Stavropol province. On. 1. D. 83,137, 165,166,170, 171,408,409, 410,411,412,413,415.

19. The Most Submissive Note on the Administration of the Caucasus Region by Count Vorontsov-Dashkov. SPb., 1907.

20. Our land: documents, materials (1777-1917). Stavropol, 1977.

21. Overview of the Stavropol province for 1900 (1901-1910) - Stavropol: Printing house of the Provincial Board, 1901-1911.

22. Report of the Stavropol governor for 1900 (1901-1910) - Stavropol: Printing house of the Provincial Board, 1901-1911.

23. Commemorative book of the Stavropol province for 1900. (1901-1909) Stavropol: Printing House of the Provincial Board, 1900 (19011909).

24. The first general census of the population of the Russian Empire. 1897 Stavropol province. T. 67. Stavropol: Edition of the Central Statistical Committee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1905.

25. Russian legislation of the X-XX centuries. In 9 volumes. Moscow, 1988.

26. Collection of materials for the description of localities and tribes of the Caucasus. Issue. 23 Tiflis: Printing house of the Office of the Commander-in-Chief of the Civil Division in the Caucasus, 1897.

27. Collection of materials for the description of localities and tribes of the Caucasus. Issue. 1,16, 23, 36. Tiflis: Printing house of the Main Directorate of the Viceroy of the Caucasus, 1880, 1893, 1897, 1906.

28. Collection of information about the North Caucasus. T. 1,3, 5, 12. Stavropol: Provincial Printing House, 1906,1909, 1911,1920.

29. Collection of statistical information about the Stavropol province. -Stavropol, 1900-1910.

30. Council of Ministers of the Russian Empire. Documents and materials. JL, 1990.

31. Lists of populated places in the Stavropol province. Collection of information about the North Caucasus. T. V. Stavropol, 1911.

32. Statistical and economic studies of the resettlement management in 1893 1909 - St. Petersburg, 1910.

33. Statistical information about the state of secondary educational institutions of the Caucasian educational district for 1905. Tiflis, 1905.1. Periodicals

34. North Caucasus. 1894. - No. 24.

35. North Caucasus. 1898.-No. 56.

36. Stavropol provincial sheets. 1875. - No. 36.

37. Stavropol provincial sheets. 1878. - No. 21.

38. Stavropol Diocesan Vedomosti. 1904.1. Literature37.

40. Adler B.F. The emergence of clothing. St. Petersburg: Typolitography, 1903.

41. Anfimov A.M. Land lease in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century. M., 1961.

42. Anfimov A.M. Large landlord economy in European Russia (late 19th early 20th century). - M.: Nauka, 1969.

43. Anfimov A.M. The economic situation and the class struggle of the peasants of European Russia. (1881-1904) M., 1984.

44. Velsky S. The village of Novo-Pavlovka//Collection of materials for the description of localities and tribes of the Caucasus. Issue. 23. Tiflis, 1897.

45. Berestovskaya JI. On holidays and weekdays. Stavropol: Stavropol book publishing house, 1968.

46. ​​Bernshtam T.A. Youth in the ritual life of the Russian community in the 19th - early 20th centuries. D.: Nauka, 1988.

47. Bobrov A. Russian calendar for all times. Memorable dates, holidays, rituals, name days. Moscow: Veche, 2004.

48. Bogachkova A.E. History of the Izobilnensky district. Stavropol: Stavropol book publishing house, 1994.

49. Bondarenko I.O. Holidays of Christian Rus'. Kaliningrad, 1993.

50. Borodin I. Historical and statistical description of the village of Hope. - Stavropol: Printing house of the Provincial Board, 1885.

51. Bubnov A. The village of Raguli//Collection of materials for the description of localities and tribes of the Caucasus. Issue. 16. Tiflis, 1893.

52. Vardugin V. Russian clothes. Saratov: Children's Book Publishing House, 2001.

53. Veniaminov P. Peasant community. St. Petersburg: A. Benke Printing House, 1908.

54. Vinogradsky V. Russian peasant yard//Volga. 1995. - No. 2, 3, 4, 7.10.

55. Golovin K. Rural community. St. Petersburg: M.M. Stasyulevich, 1887.54