Mistakes of beginner psychologists Video will help psychologists to build their identity correctly at the beginning of practice plan their training to avoid common mistakes in the organization of practice, it is important to set up work with clients correctly to form a realistic expectation It is important for a novice psychologist in the process of organizing his practice to focus on truly key aspects in order to properly distribute his resource. To do this, it is always useful to get acquainted with the experience of […]

As a progressive scientist of his time, Freud was conservative in his personal life. In his family, between him and his wife Martha, nee Bernays, the roles were distributed in accordance with the gender traditions of that era. Here is what Peter Guy writes in Freud: “Undoubtedly one of the reasons why Fliess became indispensable to Freud in the 1990s […]

It's just a movie ... In recent discussions of the Trigger series, the thought “It's just a movie”, “This is fiction, you should not take it so seriously”, “People will not conclude about the work of a psychotherapist on the series” was repeatedly heard. I was somewhat surprised by the statements that cinema does not influence the formation of a person's ideas about the world in which he […]

Should the therapist look for a trigger? Criticism of the series Recently, the series “Trigger” was released on TV. In the professional psychotherapeutic community, he immediately caused a resonance. From the first episodes, a really practicing psychotherapist, who was educated in the spirit of European standards, becomes uneasy from the inaccuracies he observes in the series, but outright distortions of the very essence of the psychotherapy process. How was Trigger filmed? […]

The question why Onegin killed Lensky is asked by many readers of Pushkin's immortal novel. In eyes modern man the duel that took place between young people looks absurd, meaningless. The reason for her was trifling. Besides, Onegin and Lensky are comrades. How could it happen that the heroes met in a duel, and one of them died? Why did Pushkin come up with such a denouement of their acquaintance?

To understand, you need to know a little about the characters themselves. Onegin is an aristocrat to the marrow of his bones: by blood, status in society, behavior. From childhood, Eugene had access to all the delights of a luxurious social life, and by the age of 24 he was mortally tired of them. Onegin no longer finds pleasure in all these balls, gossip, intrigues.

He despises the representatives of his circle - people, in his opinion, empty and worthless. He has a sharp critical mind. A young man wants something more in life, something meaningful, real. However, he cannot change himself, and remains just a cynic looking down on the world.

Lensky is quite another matter. First, he is younger. Vladimir is only 18 years old. Secondly, he has a completely different temperament. Lensky is a romantic, an enthusiastic person who likes life as it is. The future looks great to him. Before us is a dreamer, a poet. If Onegin can be called cold-blooded, then Lensky is hot and ardent.

It is difficult to understand what brought together such different people. Nevertheless, having met in the village, they began to communicate and even became friends. Perhaps the law of mutual attraction of opposites worked here. Then why was that fatal shot that cut short his young life and why did Eugene Onegin kill Lensky?

The reason for the duel was an incident at the Larins' ball. Lensky invited Onegin there. The latter was unbearably bored to be at this, in his opinion, useless gathering. He was angry with Vladimir for the invitation and began to flirt with Olga Larina, Lensky's lover.

The coquettish and stupid girl accepted the courtship of the young man, although there was nothing serious on either side. Naturally, Lensky was touched by this flirtation. He is young, hot and emotional. His challenge to Onegin is quite logical.

Eugene could have refused, explained himself to a friend, dissuaded him from a fatal step, apologized. For an adult person who has known life, who has a cold head, just such behavior would be logical. However, Onegin accepted the challenge. And here it is necessary to "bring into the light of God" true reason duel.

Both - Eugene and Vladimir were brought up in the western spirit fashionable for that period. The boys were raised by foreign tutors who instilled in them the values ​​of Europe, where duels were in the order of things. In Pushkin's Russia, this way of sorting things out has already taken root. It approved elite. It was considered cowardly not to challenge the offender to a duel, and shameful not to “pick up the glove”.

with Lensky this case everything is clear, but how could Onegin, who despised the high society with its "rotten" values, be led by the traditions that disgusted him so much? The whole point is that, despising his contemporary society, Eugene continued to be a part of it.

Therefore, he could not act contrary to public opinion, even in the face of death. This contradiction is the tragedy of the hero. This is precisely the real reason for the duel, which Pushkin wanted to show that it is not enough to deny something, you also need to be able to resist it, have courage, and remain true to your principles.
Onegin was weak. He took the life of not only his young comrade, but to some extent himself. Having betrayed his ideals, following the lead of society, Eugene buried himself spiritually. So terrible, but fair, was the retribution for double standards Onegin.

In the novel by A. S. Pushkin "Eugene Onegin" one of the saddest scenes is the duel between Lensky and Onegin. But why did the author decide to bring them into a duel? What motivated young people? Could this situation have been avoided? Below is an analysis of the episode of the duel between Lensky and Onegin.

Before moving on to the discussion, let's make up the duels of Onegin and Lensky. This is necessary so that the review of the scene goes consistently, and the reader can understand why this episode was introduced into the novel.

Reasons for the fight

Why did Lensky challenge his friend to a duel? Readers will remember that Vladimir was a man of a soft, romantic disposition, in contrast to Yevgeny, a cynical person who was tired of the world, always bored. The reason for the duel is banal - jealousy. But who and why was jealous?

Lensky brought Onegin to Larina. If Vladimir had his own interest (he was the bridegroom of the sister of the birthday girl, Olga), then Eugene was bored. To this is added the attention of Tatyana, who is in love with him. All this only causes irritation in the young man, and the reason for his bad mood he chose Lensky.

Onegin decides to take revenge on his friend for spoiling the evening and begins to court his bride. Olga was a windy girl, so she gladly accepted Evgeny's courtship. Lensky does not understand what is happening and, determined to put an end to it, invites her to dance. But Olga ignores his invitation and continues to waltz with Onegin. Humiliated, Lensky leaves the party and challenges his only friend to a duel.

Brief description of the duel between Onegin and Lensky

Eugene receives a call through Zaretsky, an acquaintance of Lensky. Onegin understands that he was to blame, that such stupidity is not worth shooting because of it. best friends. He repents and realizes that the meeting could have been avoided, but proud young people do not refuse the fatal meeting...

When analyzing the episode of the duel between Lensky and Onegin, one should note Yevgeny's attempts to provoke Vladimir's refusal to duel: he is an hour late, appoints a servant as his second. But Lensky prefers not to notice this and waits for a friend.

Zaretsky counts the required number of steps, the young people are preparing to shoot. While Lensky takes aim, Onegin shoots first. Vladimir dies instantly, Eugene, shocked by this, leaves. Zaretsky, taking Lensky's body, goes to the Larins.

Could there be another outcome of the fight?

Analyzing the episode of the duel between Lensky and Onegin, it should be noted what role Zaretsky played in this story. If you carefully read the novel, you can find lines that hint at the fact that it was he who persuaded Lensky to call Onegin to shoot himself.

It was also in the power of Zaretsky to prevent the duel. After all, Eugene realized his guilt and no longer wanted to participate in this farce. And Levin's second was supposed to try to reconcile the rivals, but this was not done. Zaretsky could cancel the duel just because Onegin was late for it, and his second was a servant, although according to the rules of a duel, only people of equal social status could be seconds. Zaretsky was the sole arbiter of the duel, but he did nothing to prevent the fatal duel.

The result of the duel

What happened to Onegin after the duel? Nothing, he just left the village. In those days, duels were forbidden, so it is obvious that the cause of Lensky's death was presented to the police in a completely different way. A simple monument was erected to Vladimir Lensky, his bride Olga soon forgot about him and married another.

How is the main character revealed in this scene?

When schoolchildren write an essay on the analysis of the episode of the duel between Onegin and Lensky, they pay great attention to which side Eugene reveals himself. It seems that he does not depend on the opinion of society and is tired of the circle of aristocrats with whom he revels and has fun. But is it because he does not refuse a duel that he is actually afraid of what society will say about him? Suddenly he will be considered a coward who did not defend his honor?

An analysis of the episode of the duel between Lensky and Onegin presents a slightly different image before the reader's eyes: Eugene is a weak-willed person who is guided not by his own judgments, but by the opinion of the world. For the sake of his selfishness, he decided to take revenge on Vladimir, not thinking about hurting his feelings. Yes, he tried to avoid the duel, but still he did not apologize and did not explain anything to his friend.

At the end of the analysis of the episode of the duel between Lensky and Onegin, one should write about the significance of the scene for the novel. It is in this fight that the real character of Eugene is revealed. Here his spiritual weakness, the duality of nature is manifested. Zaretsky can be compared with a secular society, the condemnation of which the hero is so afraid of.

The death of Lensky suggests that people with a fine mental organization cannot survive in a deceitful one. They are too elevated, sensitive and sincere. It is worth noting that Eugene Onegin is a collective character who has absorbed the typical features of secular society.

But as readers know, the author did not spare Onegin, and in literature he is considered a cynical hero with a hard heart. He rejected Tatyana's love, ruined a friend, played with human feelings. And when he repented and realized that he had done wrong, it was already too late. Onegin never found his happiness, his destiny is loneliness among people who are not interesting to him ...

This was brief analysis episode of the duel between Onegin and Lensky, which reveals the essence of this scene in the work.

This explains the mistake of those who accuse Onegin of deliberate murder.
https://ru-bykov.livejournal.com/3334566.html

Let us turn to the history of the duel between Onegin and Lensky. That it was possible to shoot in the air, Bykov takes from Pisarev, and both simply do not know how it was with duels in those days. But if the commoner Pisarev can be forgiven, then the commoner Bykov's ignorance in this matter is unforgivable. For Lotman explained everything long ago. The rules of duels changed throughout the 19th century, and in Pushkin's time they were the most severe and rigidly ritualized.

Zaretsky was obliged to discuss the possibility of reconciliation when handing over the cartel. But this “bachelor of the family” hastened to take his leave, “having a lot to do” ...

Secondly, according to the rules, Zaretsky was obliged to make an attempt at reconciliation before the start of the fight. He did not even hint about it, and Onegin, in the position of being summoned, could not recall it. It was supposed to wait on the spot for a quarter of an hour (after which the duel was declared invalid, and the seconds of the one who appeared should draw up a protocol about this). Onegin was two hours late, but the duel was not cancelled. Seconds should be equal in position, he brought a servant, which was an insult to Zaretsky. And for the second time he insulted him quite directly: Although he is not a famous person, // but certainly an honest fellow. // Zaretsky bit his lip...

Onegin did everything that depended on him so that the duel did not take place, violating all the established rules. Zaretsky preferred not to notice anything - he really wanted a bloody duel to take place. He even silently endured the double insult by Onegin. In this light, the author's characterization of him as a pedant in dueling rules is downright mocking.

Bykov claims that Onegin could have refused the duel, but did not do so, as he valued Zaretsky's opinion. Another slander against Onegin, another invention of our dashing friend. Zaretsky knew how, says the poet, “To quarrel young friends // And put them on the barrier, // Or force them to reconcile, // In order to have breakfast together, // And then secretly dishonor // With a cheerful joke, a lie.”

The reputation is still ... But here, after all, everything is written in black and white:

He had to disarm
Young heart. "But now
It's too late; time has flown...
... Besides - he thinks - in this matter
The old duelist intervened;
He is angry, he is a gossip, he is a talker...
Of course there must be contempt
At the cost of his funny words,
But the whisper, the laughter of fools ... "
And so public opinion! (Ch. 6, XI, italics mine - EAT)

Onegin knew that if he directly refused the duel, Zaretsky would blather everywhere, and even embellish it. For a man of honor, the rejection of the challenge in itself, regardless of motivations, was unacceptable, but Onegin, cursing himself for what happened, still considers such an option ... However, this meant being branded a coward for the whole world.

You can only try to prevent the duel by breaking the rules... Being late can have a thousand reasons... They will reassign, but the enemy will have time to cool down... And Zaretsky will not dare to spread bad rumors, otherwise Onegin will be obliged to call him to prove that he is not a coward. .. Everything was calculated by both, but Zaretsky violated the rules, knowing that Lensky would not protest, and Onegin could not ...

“Onegin’s words addressed to Lensky, “Well, shall we begin?” should be understood as said after a pause, during which Onegin vainly expected conciliatory steps from Zaretsky, writes Lotman. “It is significant that with these words he, contrary to all the rules (enemies on the battlefield do not enter into any direct relations), addressed directly to Lensky, defiantly ignoring Zaretsky.”

“Onegin’s behavior in the duel irrefutably testifies that the author wanted to make him a murderer involuntarily,” continues Yu. M.

For all contemporaries of P, it was obvious that he who wants to kill the enemy does not shoot first (converged from 32 steps). He allows the enemy to shoot first, and then (if not killed) requires him to the barrier (10 or even 6 steps) and shoots him at close range. True, at the discretion of the seconds, the rules left the possibility of setting the condition that after the first shot (whoever fired it), both participants remain in the place where they were caught by the shot. Zaretsky did not do this either.

Therefore, Onegin fired first - when they had just begun to converge, but had not yet reached the barrier. He aimed, most likely at the feet of the enemy, because an unsuccessful duel was not allowed, it had to be repeated. Lotman gives many examples of real duels of the time and mentions the case when the one who aimed at the legs hit the chest.

In the light of everything that has gone before, what happened on the Black River becomes somewhat clearer. The conditions of that duel provided that after the first shot, both remain in place. So writes Lotman. Dantès, most likely knowing that Pushkin was an excellent shot, fired first to prevent the convergence to the barrier. How good a marksman he was, we do not know. We know where the bullet hit, but where he was aiming, we are unlikely to find out. There is still a lot of uncertainty about how Dantes survived when Pushkin's return shot hit him in the chest...