Gryaznov Mikhail. The initial phase of the development of the Scythian-Siberian cultures

It is generally accepted that the beginning of the Scythian culture is determined in the 7th century. BC, and the period of the 7th-6th centuries, well distinguished by archaeological monuments. BC. consider and call the early Scythian time.

Meanwhile, back in 1953, A.A. Jessen convincingly showed that the so-called. The “early Scythian time” is preceded by a period whose quite peculiar monuments characterize a special stage of the culture of the early Iron Age in our European south, date back to the 8th-7th centuries. BC. and represent "the initial stage in the development of Scythian culture in the broad sense of the term." The main provisions of the work of A.A. Jessen were accepted in our science, were further developed, but his final thesis about the initial stage of the Scythian culture did not receive recognition - the period of the VIII-VII centuries. BC. usually called Cimmerian or pre-Scythian and is not included in the concept of Scythian culture.

Regardless of which specific tribes left certain groups of monuments of the 8th-7th centuries. BC. in the Northern Black Sea region, it must be admitted, following Jessen, that in the steppes of Our South a Scythian culture has already formed, or rather, cultures of the Scythian-Siberian types. After all, the arrows in these monuments are already quite Scythian types. Swords and daggers are closer to the Scythian 7th-6th centuries. BC, but not to the Late Bronze Age. Also, bronze bits, cheek-pieces and much more - everything belongs to the initial forms of the Scythian types of things. And although all these things are well distinguishable from the "early Scythian things" of the 7th-6th centuries. BC, but differ from them to the same extent as these latter are distinguishable from the things of the heyday of the Scythian culture of the 5th-3rd centuries. BC.

Archaeologists of Siberia, Kazakhstan and Central Asia, relying on Eastern European parallels, they dated all their monuments of early nomads of the archaic type to a time no earlier than the 7th century. BC. This is how ideas about the Aral Sea Saks of the 7th-5th centuries were created. BC, about the Tasmolin culture in Kazakhstan and the Mayemir stage in Altai in the 7th-6th centuries. BC, although some authors in some cases suggested earlier dates - IX-VII centuries. BC.

Ideas about the 7th century BC. as the date of the beginning of the Scythian culture are very strong in our minds, but we need to get rid of them and re-examine all the relevant archaeological material. Then we will be convinced that the monuments of the Scythian-Siberian appearance, which can be identified as the IX-VII centuries. BC, are already known in many areas of the Great Steppe Belt. First of all, this is the royal burial mound Arzhan. Characterized by him early stage cultures of the Scythian type in Tuva are a phenomenon common to the wide expanses of the steppe zone. Let's call this period (IX-VII centuries BC) the Arzhan-Chernogorov phase of the development of the Scythian-Siberian cultures.

Widespread in Tuva (as well as in the steppes of the Black Sea region and other regions) three-fluted plaques (Fig. 1-6 ) and plaques from wild boar tusks (Fig. , 7-26 ), the former were made of white argillite, greenish semi-precious antigorite and gilded wood, the latter were of various shapes - round, binary, comma-shaped and butterfly-shaped;

The existing Scythian-Siberian animal style, represented by images of animals "on tiptoe", sculpted figures of argali on the tops, a predator rolled in a circle, i.e. "Panther" (Fig.);

Deer stones of the Mongolian type, in full form representing the figure of a warrior with a conditionally schematically shown cap, earrings, three oblique lines instead of a face, a necklace, a belt with a dagger, bow and ax hung on it, often covered with many silhouette images of animals, mainly deer, distributed in different variants far west to Bulgaria and Romania;

Petroglyphs (images of deer and other animals in the same peculiar style as on deer stones - "on tiptoe", in a gallop, with an unnaturally elongated muzzle, similar to a long bird's beak, in various combinations and compositions).

All this, except for the animal style, is also characteristic of the steppes of the far west, for the so-called "Cimmerian" or "pre-Scythian" time in the Northern Black Sea region.

The initial, Arzhan-Chernogorovskaya, phase of the development of the Scythian-Siberian cultures has been most fully and deeply studied in the region of the Russian-Ukrainian steppes of the Northern Black Sea region. A great merit in this belongs to A.I. Terenozhkin, who published a number of articles and a special

monograph on the question of the Cimmerians. In the steppes of our south, burial grounds of the 8th-7th centuries. BC. unknown. Graves were usually built one at a time on separate hills or mounds (ancient barrows), less often two on one hill (5 cases) and even more rarely three on a hill (3 cases) or on two neighboring hills (2 cases). Only in one case was a burial ground discovered and investigated, consisting of seven (or maybe only three?) Small mounds of the "pre-Scythian" time (the village of Suvorovo, Odessa region). Men were often buried with weapons, as well as with a bridle and a saddle, sometimes placed separately outside the grave. The material from the burials is typologically heterogeneous.

Daggers and swords three types: 1 - iron with a bronze (cross-shaped) handle, the pommel of which is mushroom-shaped, the guard is straight with long wings; 2 - iron and bimetallic with a characteristic guard with sharp corners of the wings lowered down (Kabardino-Balkarian type); 3 - bronze with a mushroom-shaped pommel and with a flat guard, the lowered wings of which have acquired the shape of parallelograms. The first two types are of North Caucasian origin, the third is close to Asian forms.

Bronze arrowheads are close to the set of arrows in Arzhan, like the Arzhan ones, they belong to the early Scythian forms.

Stone drilled hatchet, hatchet-hammer, cylindrical hammers and bronze axes of the boar [ Koban] type - all are similar to the North Caucasian.

A bridle with a bit with stirrup-shaped rings and cheek-pieces of the Chernogorov, Kamyshevakh and Tsimbal types is characteristic. The first two types are similar to the corresponding forms of the Sayan-Altai cheek-pieces, the third was common in Ciscaucasia. Along with this, North Caucasian types of bridles are common, the ringed bits of which are equipped with a hole for fastening with cheek-pieces - the so-called "two-ringed bits" with a small ring-hole at the base of a slightly larger ring (Fig. 6, 8 ), and cheek-pieces are three-looped with a characteristic curved lobe. Other North Caucasian types of bridles have also been encountered. Saddles are represented by spring buckles, also of the North Caucasian type - a pair of large rings with a plaque loop for attaching to a belt (Fig. 7 ) and with a more complex device for attaching and fastening the belt (Fig. , 21 ).

So in Tuva, all kinds of three-fluted plaques are common, white argillite, from a horse’s tooth, bronze in complex compositions of strap plaques, in bits and as a dagger pommel (Fig. 1-6 ), as well as plaques from boar tusks, which are usually incorrectly called bone plaques in publications (Fig. 9-20 ).

Club-shaped figures are widespread in different versions, the basis of which is a circle framed on four sides by mushroom-shaped hats in profile (Fig. 21-24, 30, 32 ). They are usually called a "diamond-shaped sign", taking the background between the circle and the caps, which has the shape of an ace of diamonds, for a rhombus, or " solar symbol". There are also peculiar lunar plaques in the form of three to seven circles arranged along an arc, sometimes paired (Fig. 25-31 ), and, finally, spiral ornaments (Fig. , 33 ).

In the last decade, a small series of anthropomorphic stelae has become known in the Crimea, Kharkov region, Bulgaria and Romania, strikingly close to the deer stones of Mongolia and the Sayan-Altai. A hat, a necklace, earrings, a belt with a weapon and other details of the schematic image of a warrior are carved on them using similar techniques. Not only deer.

The Northern Black Sea region appears to us at the time of the initial phase of the development of the culture of the Scythian-Siberian tribes as an original ethno-cultural formation, which was formed, however, in interaction with the cultures of other regions of the steppes, including very remote ones. The closest cultural connection should be assumed with the tribes of the North Caucasus and Ciscaucasia. Over time, with the accumulation of material, the region under consideration can probably be divided into several separate cultural and historical regions, which, however, some researchers are already planning.

Another large ethno-cultural region is the North Caucasus and Ciscaucasia. Several local cultures are well distinguished here. In our analysis, however, it is more convenient to consider it as a whole. Burial grounds have been studied here, sometimes consisting of dozens of graves, most of which have not yet been published or have been published only selectively. The region is characterized by daggers of the two already mentioned North Caucasian types (Fig. 3, 4, 6- 5 ) and arrowheads of early Scythian types. Note the daggers with a spiral ornament on a bronze hilt from the Mebelnaya fabrika 1 burial ground near Kislovodsk (Fig. 7 ) and the village of Abazdekhskaya in the Kuban region. Analogies to such a decor of the handle, as we will see below, are far in the East.

The male graves of the Kislovodsk group of burial grounds usually contain one of the following items, apparently of a prestigious nature (signs that their owner belongs to a certain social category?): a stone hatchet (Fig. 9, 10 ); stone cylindrical hammer (Fig., 11, 12 ); the same bronze hammer (Fig. 13, 14 ); bronze hatchet-hammer (fig., 15 ); bronze ax of the Koban type (fig., 16 ); bronze or silver mace (fig., 17, 18, 20 ) or, finally, a miniature club-shaped object (Fig. 19 ). Here you can clearly see that it was the mace that served as the prototype for the club-shaped ornamental figures (possibly of magical or sacred significance), the so-called "diamond-shaped signs" (compare, for example, fig. 17 and fig. , 21, 22 ). Some of the listed items are already noted above in the steppes. They are also known in the East - in Kazakhstan and Tuva.

The bridle is usually of the North Caucasian type with characteristic ring-shaped bits with a hole for a cheek-piece and with three-loop cheek-pieces. A loop with a plaque for a rein is usually inserted into the round ring of the bit. In addition, as in the Northern Black Sea region, bits with a stirrup-shaped ring and cheek-pieces of the Chernogorov, Kamyshevakh and Tsimbal types and girth buckles are common. Three-fluted plaques and plaques from wild boar tusks were found as bridle ornaments (Fig. 1, 2, 5 ). Quite often there are "moons" and club-shaped figures.

Now it has become known, although still small, but still a series of so-called deer stones, even closer to the Mongolian ones, but, as in the Northern Black Sea region, without deer (Fig.). They constitute a stylistically unique group of stelae, which differ both from those of the North Black Sea and from Asia.

In general, the North Caucasus and Ciscaucasia at the time under consideration were a vast area inhabited by tribes close in culture, who preserved and developed their local traditions, but in many respects adopted the main features of the culture of the early nomads of the Arzhan-Chernogorov phase common to all steppe tribes. Closer contacts can be traced with the tribes of the Black Sea steppe.

The third region, attributed to the Aral Sea Sakas, is known to us from two extensive burial mounds (Tagisken and Uygarlyk [ Uygarak]), located in the valley of the river. Syr Darya. The remains of the buried usually lie on the ancient surface of the earth. Above them, some kind of wooden-earthen construction of a pillar structure was arranged. The feet of the buried men contained a bit, a pair of girth buckles, and belt plaques. These are obviously the remains of a bridle and a saddle placed in the grave. The weapons are different from the previous areas. Bronze and iron daggers with a wide oval guard. Arrowheads are predominantly trihedral and three-bladed, petiolate - forms that originated in Kazakhstan and Central Asia as early as the Late Bronze Age. There are also socketed arrowheads with a rhombic and lanceolate nib of early Scythian types. Bronze ones were found - a cylindrical hammer of the North Caucasian type, a mace. There are bronze and iron all-metal knives, including those with a ring-top, a form typical of the eastern regions.

Excellent and bridle. A bit with a round and stirrup-shaped ring, usually strict, with rows of tubercles along the shaft. Chest-pieces are rarely bronze and horn. They were usually made, apparently, from unstable materials (wood, thick leather) and therefore have not been preserved - only bits are often found in the graves. Characteristic are peculiar bridle devices with cheek-pieces put on the “stirrup” bit, for which the middle hole in the cheek-piece was made oblong, and the “stirrup” was supplied with an emphasis at its base. Sometimes the cheek-pieces and the link for the bit were cast as a single unit.

Spring buckles are also peculiar - a pair of rings with a frame on the side for a belt. One ring is smooth, the other has a hoof-stud for fastening the belt. There are numerous bronze belt plaques and threads. Club-shaped figurines are common.

Plaques, buckles and other items are often decorated in the Scythian-Siberian animal style - a deer, a mountain goat, a predator, a bird, etc.: "on tiptoe", in a gallop, coiled into a ring.

The fourth vast region is Central, part of Northern Kazakhstan. Here, at many points, small groups of burial mounds of the Tasmolin culture, close to the culture of the Sakas of the Aral region, have been explored. In soil burial pits, men were usually buried with a bridle and a saddle. Sometimes the head of a horse with a bridle put on it was put in the grave (or maybe it was the skin of a horse with a skull left in it?).

Bronze daggers with a wide guard, approaching in shape to butterfly-shaped ones, are peculiar. Knives are usually with a pommel in the form of a small ring. The arrowheads are similar to the Aral ones.

A bit with a hole or with a loop hole at the base of the stirrup-shaped ring is characteristic, which is a special device for rigidly attaching the cheek-piece to the bit with a strap (Fig. 6, 7, 12 ). In one case, at the base of the usual stirrup-shaped ring, a part of the strap was preserved, with which the cheek-piece was tied in the same way as in Arzhan (Fig. 11 ). As in the Aral Sea region, there is a bit with an emphasis for the cheek-piece at the base of the stirrup and a cheek-piece with an oblong oval middle hole (Fig. 5 ). There are simply three-hole cheek-pieces, bronze and horn (Fig. 1, 3 ). Often there are only bits in the grave - cheek-pieces, apparently, were wooden or leather. In general, similar versions of the bridle device were common in Central Kazakhstan and the Aral Sea region.

The images of animals in bronze, gold and horn items are diverse (mountain goat, wild boar, predator). To the monuments of Tasmolinskaya

culture should also include the drawings of marching deer carved on the rocks of Arpauzen-V in the foothills of the Karatau ridge. A bronze plaque with a club-shaped figure was found in one of the complexes.

Interesting, but extremely few, monuments of different regions of Central Asia, similar to the Aral Sea and Tasmolin. This is, first of all, a find in Semirechie, in the Bizhe tract, a complex of 4 bridles and a pair of bronze tops. The bit of two bridles with a hole at the base of the stirrup-shaped ring with three-hole cheek-pieces, two other bridles with an emphasis for fixing the cheek-piece and cheek-pieces with an oval middle hole. In the Tien Shan, the discovery of a bridle complex on the lake has long been known. Issyk-Kul. A bit with an emphasis for a cheek-piece, a cheek-piece of a peculiar shape with two eyelets on the reverse side and a middle oval hole for the bit ring. Plaques and conical fasteners with a characteristic "knot" ornament. An interesting ring plaque with the image of six animals marching in a circle. West along the river Talas, on the rocks, discovered a series of petroglyphs - deer, wild boars, predators, bulls, etc. - all depicted in the early Scythian-Siberian style. In the Pamir Mountains, a small burial ground, Pamirskaya 1, and several burial mounds at other points have been explored. The buried in one barrow was lying, apparently, with his head on the saddle (a bronze girth buckle and several belt plaques were found around the skull), and a bridle was placed on the side of the belt. The bits with a hole in the base are stirrup-shaped, the cheek-pieces are three-loop. The fastening of the cheek-piece to the bits with a strap, threaded into the hole of the bit and into the middle loop of the cheek-piece and tied at both ends with a knot, has been preserved. Iron knives and daggers and bronze arrowheads of the Tasmolin-Aral type. Bronze plaques are made in the Scythian-Siberian animal style (mountain goat and predator). There is a club-shaped figurine.

The cultural and historical affiliation of the listed monuments and some others, less expressive, is not yet completely clear. Some of them, perhaps, should be attributed to the Tasmolin culture. It is possible that in Kazakhstan and Central Asia, over time, several separate close and related cultures will be established, constituting one vast cultural community. It is possible that the steppes of Kazakhstan and Central Asia represented at the time under consideration a large ethno-cultural region, different from the North Caucasian and Black Sea steppe regions.

The fifth region or region is the steppes and forest-steppes to the west and north of Altai. The main archaeological material here comes mainly from ground burials with relatively poor grave goods. So, in the Western foothills of Altai along the river. The Irtysh is aware of a large series of graves in the vast Zevakino burial ground, close to the Bolsherechenskaya culture sites on the Upper Ob and near the city of Tomsk. At the same time, there are monuments of a completely Tasmolin appearance (burials of Kamyshin and Chisty Yar). These two heterogeneous groups of monuments are united by me according to their territorial and chronological proximity, but they undoubtedly belong to different ethnic or social groups of the population of the same territory. In general, the western foothills are characterized by bronze lamellar knives with a ring-shaped pommel, already familiar to us from Tasmolin, and with a semi-ring pommel (“with an arch on a bracket”), socketed bronze arrowheads with a rhombic feather. A three-fluted argillite plaque, a bronze plaque with the image of a predator folded into a circle, and bronze belt piercings with a club-shaped figure were found.

A settlement of the Bolsherechenskaya culture and three soil burial grounds belonging to it were studied on the Upper Ob. In addition, bronze bits and a pair of pommel with the figure of a deer were accidentally found in the village. Headquarters near the city of Barnaul and at different points - a small series of bronze tools. Judging by these monuments, three-fluted plaques (argillite, bronze and from beaver chisels), bronze socketed arrowheads with a rhombic feather, and daggers with a mushroom-shaped hat and a flat guard, straight or with wings down, were common on the Upper Ob. Remarkable is such a dagger, found near the city of Biysk, with a spiral, as in the North Caucasus (Fig., 7 ), the ornament of the handle.

Very close to the Bolsherechensky monuments in the region of Tomsk and the adjacent part of the Novosibirsk region, now singled out as an independent Zavyalovo culture. For our topic, the most interesting is the Tomsk burial ground, the main monument of culture. It is characterized by bronze knives and daggers of the same types as on the Upper Ob and Western Altai. Bronze chasings and a yoke-shaped object of unknown purpose, similar to those characteristic of the Baino stage in the steppes of the Minusinsk Basin.

In the sixth region, in Altai, there are several, usually stone, graves in small burial grounds (Kurtu, Ust-Kuyum, etc.), a rather large series of deer stones in the southeastern part of the mountain range, as well as petroglyphs and random finds of bronze objects. A riding horse with a bridle was buried in a separate grave arranged for him, next to the grave of his owner. A bridle without a bit. The cheek-pieces, usually horn, are close to those of Arzhan and Chernogorovsk. Characteristic are long daggers with a mushroom-shaped pommel and a straight guard, similar to the cruciform daggers of the Northern Black Sea region and Ciscaucasia, or with a flat guard, the wings of which look like lowered parallelograms, similar to the third type of daggers of the Northern Black Sea region. Among the random finds, we note a three-groove argillite plaque and bronze mirrors with a vertical border along the edge and a flat loop on the reverse side, including the well-known Bukhtarma mirror depicting five deer and a mountain goat in a “on tiptoe” pose.

Images of animals in the Scythian-Siberian style are presented in bronze and gold items, on deer stones and in rock paintings. Deer stones, like the Tuvan ones, are of the Mongolian type, but not so magnificently decorated with figures of deer and other animals. Usually this is a very laconic image of a warrior, whose image is limited to only some symbols and sometimes comes down to only three oblique lines on one side and a ring on the other two, or to a series of dots (necklace) encircling the upper part of the stone, and three lines above it, etc. .d. On the rocks, silhouette drawings of deer, horses and other animals are given in a pose standing "on tiptoe" and in a gallop.

In general, the archaeological materials of Altai for the period under consideration are still completely insufficient and fragmentary. One can only see that this most interesting region of the “Scythian steppe world”, the culture of the early nomads of which is well known from the later famous Pazyryk-type royal burial mounds, experienced the initial phase of the development of the culture of the Scythian-Siberian tribes common to all steppe peoples, but to make up at least some we cannot yet have a complete idea of ​​the uniqueness of the Altai tribes of that time, which undoubtedly took place.

The seventh region, the Minusinsk steppe basin, has been better studied in archaeological terms than all other regions of Siberia and Kazakhstan. Fenced off on three sides outside world difficult-to-pass mountain ranges of Altai and Sayan, the ancient population of the basin consistently developed its culture over many historical periods in original original forms, preserving their local traditions for centuries and, at the same time, in constant contact with the surrounding nomadic tribes. Still remaining semi-nomadic, with a yailage-type economy, but not nomadic, the ancient population of the period under consideration, here called the Baino stage of the Tagar culture, had much in common in its culture with the nomadic tribes of the open steppes.

The main sources for studying the culture of the Baino stage are burial grounds containing up to 20-30 graves of the original device in each, and random finds of bronze items. Men and women were buried equally in stone boxes made of massive sandstone slabs. Each grave was surrounded by a small square fence built from the same vertically placed slabs. The graves of the tribal and tribal nobility were distinguished by their significant size, a more complex construction of a stone grave structure, and somewhat richer inventory. Unlike all other regions, neither a horse nor a harness was buried with the dead. Weapons and tools, except for a knife, are rare in the graves. They are known mainly from chance finds. Characteristic are daggers with a mushroom-shaped or annular handle pommel and with a flat rectangular guard, lamellar knives with a pommel in the form of a ring or half ring. Bronze chasings were common, similar to those found in Arzhan, and chasings of a peculiar form and axes with a beak-shaped bent heel. There are no finds of bridle sets. Among random finds there are numerous bits with a stirrup ring and the same with a hole in the base of the stirrup, as in Kazakhstan. The graves contained bronze yoke-shaped objects, similar to those found in the Tomsk burial ground, and three-fluted argillite plaques. There is a small series of images of animals made in the Scythian-Siberian style. These are figurines of a deer and a mountain goat in a pose “on tiptoe” on the handles of bronze knives, similar to the Tuvan one from Turan (Fig. 4 ), figures of predators inscribed in a circle, etc.

The eighth region - Tuva - was considered at the beginning of this article mainly based on the materials of the Arzhan kurgan.

The ninth region adjacent to it - Mongolia - is very poorly explored. A huge number of deer stones are known, small number random finds of bronze items and petroglyphs. This is undoubtedly a special area, different from the neighboring ones considered, with somewhat peculiar forms of the few items known to us so far. Deer stones are the most numerous and varied. They were discovered and studied by V.V. Volkov and E.A. Novgorodova over 500, but only a small part has been published. Many of them, almost over the entire surface, are filled with silhouette images of deer, sometimes other animals in characteristic style, pose and composition. In the same style and in the same poses, but in different compositions, deer and other animals were also depicted on the rocks. Mongolia, apparently, was the center of the formation of a magnificent style in monumental art, in the images on the stone of the silhouettes of a deer, as well as a goat, predators, a wild boar and other animals.

but, hopefully, in time they will be opened, since those stored in different countries world, in museums and in the hands of private owners of the collection of "Ordos bronzes" contain some things that are clearly Arzhan-Montenegrin circle. Acquired from finders and plunderers of ancient graves, they are all without passports, even their origin is not always reliable.

journey from the Ordos. Of these, we note only the latest novelty, recently acquired National Museum in Tokyo - a collection of bronze knives found in Ordos. Among them there are several, undoubtedly, of interest to us. These are lamellar knives with a handle directly cut off at the top or with a pommel in the form of a half-ring and other shapes, characteristic of the Sayan-Altai. Their hilt is decorated on both sides

Rice. 3. Tuva. Animal style.
1-3, 5-7 - Arzhan; 4 - Turan.
(1, 3-7 - bronze; 2 - tusk of a wild boar).

(Open Fig. 3 in a new window)

Rice. 4. Northern Black Sea region. Plaques and other decorations.
1 - Vasilyevka, 2, 3, 4, 24 - High grave, 5 - Nosachev mound, 6 - Kvitki, 7 - Butenki, 8, 21 - Gireeva grave, 9-12 - Lugansk, 13-18 - Vesyolaya Dolina, 19, 20 - Subbotovskoe settlement, 22 - Ryzhanovka, 23 - Bird's grave, 25-26, 31 - Middle Dnieper, 27-30, 32 - Zolny barrow, 33 - Ositnyazhka.
1, 4 - white stone, 2 - horse's tooth, 3 - iron, 5-8, 21, 22, 25, 26, 31, 33 - bronze, 9-20 - boar's tusk, 23, 24-30 - gold with inlay .

(Open Fig. 4 in a new window)

Mikhail Petrovich Gryaznov(March 13, 1902, Berezov, Tobolsk province, Russia - August 18, 1987, Leningrad, USSR) - Soviet historian, archaeologist, anthropologist.

Biography

Mikhail Gryaznov was born into the family of a city school inspector. He graduated from the 2nd real school in Tomsk, in 1919 he entered the natural department of the Physics and Mathematics Faculty of Tomsk University. In the summer of 1920, while rafting along the Yenisei with a classmate, also a future ethnographer, Evgeny Shneider, he met archaeologist Sergei Teploukhov, who was excavating near the village of Bateni. From this casual acquaintance, Gryaznov began his passion for archeology.

On November 29, 1933, Gryaznov, like many of his colleagues, including Teploukhov, was arrested in the case of the "Russian National Party" ("Case of the Slavists"). He was sentenced to three years of exile in Vyatka. After returning to Leningrad in 1937, he worked in the Hermitage. During the war, Gryaznov lived in evacuation in Sverdlovsk, where he defended his candidate (January 1945) and doctoral (June of the same year) dissertations.

After the end of the war, he returned to Leningrad again, worked in the Hermitage and (head of the sector of Central Asia and the Caucasus). In 1956, the scientist was rehabilitated. Gryaznov continued to actively engage in science until the end of his life, went on expeditions. In particular, in 1971-1974, he excavated the early Scythian mound Arzhan (VIII-VII centuries BC), and came up with a hypothesis about the Asian origin of the Scythian culture.

The main scientific works are devoted to the study of the activities, culture and economic way of life of nomads in the territory of modern Kazakhstan, Central Asia and Western Siberia in the Bronze Age, the history of the Saks, Massagets and Usuns.

Awards

Compositions

Write a review on the article "Gryaznov, Mikhail Petrovich"

Notes

Links

  • Tikhonov I. L.

An excerpt characterizing Gryaznov, Mikhail Petrovich

“Trunila, first of all, is not a dog, but a survivor,” thought Nikolai and looked sternly at his sister, trying to make her feel the distance that should have separated them at that moment. Natasha understood this.
“You, uncle, don’t think that we interfere with anyone,” said Natasha. We stand where we are and don't move.
“And a good thing, countess,” said my uncle. “Just don’t fall off the horse,” he added, “otherwise it’s a pure march!” - nothing to hold on to.
The island of Otradnensky order could be seen a hundred fathoms away, and those arriving approached it. Rostov, finally deciding with his uncle where to throw the hounds from and showing Natasha a place where she should stand and where nothing could run, headed for the race over the ravine.
“Well, nephew, you’re becoming a seasoned one,” said the uncle: don’t iron (pickle).
- As it is necessary, answered Rostov. - Punish, fuit! he shouted, answering this call to the words of his uncle. Karay was an old and ugly, burly male, known for that he single-handedly took a seasoned wolf. Everyone got into place.
The old count, knowing his son's hunting fervor, hurried not to be late, and before the arrivals had time to drive up to the place, Ilya Andreevich, cheerful, ruddy, with trembling cheeks, on his crows, rolled through the greenery to the manhole left to him and, straightening his fur coat and putting on hunting shells, climbed onto his smooth, well-fed, meek and kind, gray-haired like him, Bethlyanka. The horses with the droshky were sent away. Count Ilya Andreich, although not a hunter by heart, but who knew the laws of hunting firmly, rode into the edge of the bushes from which he was standing, took apart the reins, straightened himself in the saddle and, feeling ready, looked around smiling.
Beside him stood his valet, an old but heavy rider, Semyon Chekmar. Chekmar kept in a pack of three dashing, but also fat, like the owner and the horse - wolfhounds. Two dogs, smart, old, lay down without a pack. About a hundred paces away in the edge of the forest stood the count's other aspirant, Mitka, a desperate rider and a passionate hunter. The count, according to an old habit, drank a silver glass of hunting casserole before the hunt, ate and washed down with a half bottle of his favorite Bordeaux.
Ilya Andreich was a little red from the wine and the ride; his eyes, covered with moisture, especially shone, and he, wrapped in a fur coat, sitting on the saddle, looked like a child who was gathered for a walk. Thin, with retracted cheeks, Chekmar, having settled down with his affairs, looked at the master with whom he had lived for 30 years in perfect harmony, and, understanding his pleasant mood, was waiting for a pleasant conversation. Another third person approached cautiously (it was obvious that it had already been learned) from behind the forest and stopped behind the count. The face was an old man in a gray beard, in a woman's bonnet and a high cap. It was the jester Nastasya Ivanovna.
“Well, Nastasya Ivanovna,” the count said in a whisper, winking at him, “just stomp the beast, Danilo will ask you.”
“I myself ... with a mustache,” said Nastasya Ivanovna.
- Shhhh! the count hissed and turned to Semyon.
Have you seen Natalya Ilyinichna? he asked Semyon. - Where's she?
“He and Pyotr Ilyich got up from the Zharovs weeds,” answered Semyon smiling. - Also ladies, but they have a big hunt.
“Are you surprised, Semyon, how she drives… huh?” - said the count, if only the man was in time!
- How not to wonder? Bold, smart.
- Where is Nikolasha? Above Lyadovsky top or what? the Count asked in a whisper.
- Yes, exactly. They already know where to be. They know the ride so subtly that Danila and I marvel at other times, ”Semyon said, knowing how to please the master.
- Drives well, doesn't it? And what is it like on a horse, huh?
- Paint a picture! As the other day from Zavarzinsky weeds they pushed the fox. They began to jump, from a lot, passion - a horse is a thousand rubles, but there is no price for a rider. Yes, look for such a young man!
“Look…” the count repeated, apparently regretting that Semyon’s speech ended so soon. – Search? he said, turning back the flaps of his fur coat and taking out a snuffbox.
- The other day, as from mass, they came out in all their regalia, so Mikhail then Sidorych ... - Semyon did not finish, hearing the rut clearly heard in the still air with the howling of no more than two or three hounds. He bowed his head, listened, and silently threatened his master. “They ran into a brood ...” he whispered, they led him straight to Lyadovskaya.
The count, forgetting to wipe the smile from his face, looked ahead of him into the distance along the lintel and, without sniffing, held a snuffbox in his hand. Following the barking of dogs, a voice was heard over the wolf, fed into Danila's bass horn; the flock joined the first three dogs, and one could hear how the voices of the hounds roared from the bay, with that special howl that served as a sign of the rut on the wolf. Those who arrived no longer squealed, but hooted, and from behind all the voices Danila's voice came out, now bassy, ​​now piercingly thin. Danila's voice seemed to fill the whole forest, came out from behind the forest and sounded far into the field.
After listening for several seconds in silence, the count and his stirrups were convinced that the hounds had split into two flocks: one large one, roaring especially fervently, began to move away, the other part of the flock rushed along the forest past the count, and with this flock Danila's hooting was heard. Both of these ruts merged, shimmered, but both moved away. Semyon sighed and bent down to straighten the bundle, in which the young male got entangled; the count also sighed, and noticing the snuff-box in his hand, he opened it and took out a pinch. "Back!" shouted Semyon at the male, which stepped out of the edge. The Count shuddered and dropped his snuffbox. Nastasya Ivanovna got down and began to lift her up.
The count and Semyon looked at him. Suddenly, as often happens, the sound of the rut instantly approached, as if, right in front of them, were the barking mouths of dogs and the hooting of Danila.
The count looked back and saw Mitka to the right, who was looking at the count with rolling eyes and, raising his hat, pointed him ahead, to the other side.
- Take care! he shouted in such a voice that it was clear that this word had long been painfully asking him to come out. And he galloped, releasing the dogs, towards the count.
The count and Semyon jumped out of the edge and to their left they saw a wolf, which, softly waddling, in a quiet hop jumped to the left of them to the very edge at which they were standing. The vicious dogs squealed and, breaking off the pack, rushed to the wolf past the legs of the horses.

Methodological and methodical principles scientific activity M.P. Gryaznov were formed, on the one hand, on the basis of the heritage of Russian archaeological, paleoanthropological, ethnographic thought of the 19th - early 20th centuries, and on the other hand, under the influence of the Marxist materialistic understanding of history (Matyushchenko V.I., Shvydkaya N.P., 1990, p. . 77–89).

It should be noted that in the 1920-1930s. The staged approach to the study of ancient societies, one of the developers of which was Academician N.Ya. Marr (Tsyb S.V., 1988; Babushkin A.P., Kolmakov V.B., Pisarevsky N.P., 1994). Initially, the theory of stadiality was developed by a researcher within the framework of linguistics. Giving language the role of a superstructure of society, it was believed that the change of "types" of production, causing changes in the social system, is reflected in collective thinking and, accordingly, in the language structure. This, in turn, made it possible to conclude that each socio-economic formation corresponds to a specific linguistic structure. A little later, N.Ya. Marr tried to correlate "linguistic stages" with historical data material culture. However, this attempt was unsuccessful, because, according to some scientists, it "was determined by a misunderstanding of the dialectical relationship between the base and the superstructure, as well as a reassessment of the ideological role of language in the development of society" (Babushkin A.P., Kolmakov V.B., Pisarevsky N.P. ., 1994, pp. 34–35). Gradually N.Ya. Marr and his associates, in particular I.I. Meshchaninov (1932), V.V. Holmsten (1933) and some others, extended the provisions of the stadial theory to the study of history. They proceeded from the idea that the process of cultural development has unity for all regions of the Old World at the initial stages of the formation of mankind. The existing differences in the forms of cultural development were deduced by researchers from unequal conditions and the dissimilar nature of their manifestation, which determine a certain variability in the general course of development. The study of the process of modification of forms in their transitions from stage to stage was proposed to be carried out within the framework of a special paleontological or genetic approach. The main content of this approach was to explain the essence of this process, taking into account all its driving forces (Babushkin A.P., Kolmakov V.B., Pisarevsky N.P., 1994, p. 36). The possibilities of considering the history of ancient societies within the framework of the paleontological (genetic) approach were demonstrated to a certain extent by I.I. Meshchaninov (1932) and V.V. Holmsten (1933) in characterizing the nomadic societies of Eurasia Scythian era, including the "Pazyryks" of Gorny Altai. Influence of the stadial theory N.Ya. Marr and his associates can be seen quite clearly in the concept of “early nomads” by M.P. Gryaznov (1939), in which the archaeologist identified three stages (stages). In addition, M.P. Gryaznov fully accepted the reconstruction of the religious, mythological and economic role of the horse among the nomads of the Altai Mountains, proposed by N.Ya. Marr and I.I. Meshchaninov (1932, pp. 10–11) (Gryaznov M.P., 1950, pp. 84–85).

No less important for the scientific activity of M.P. Gryaznov had evolutionary and ethnological developments of his teacher S.A. Teploukhova (Kitova L.Yu., 1994; Bobrov V.V., 1994). In his cultural and historical interpretations, M.P. Gryaznov proceeded from the conclusion of S.A. Teploukhov that one archaeological culture is replaced by another - more developed. At the same time, the researcher did not absolutize evolutionary development, but paid serious attention to the role of ethnocultural contacts and migrations in this process (Kitova L.Yu., 1994, p. 66).

The indicated theoretical base formed the basis for the study of one of the central themes in the work of M.P. Gryaznov, dedicated to the culture of the nomads of the Altai Mountains of the Scythian era. The most noticeable contribution to this was made in the late 1920s - 1950s, that is, during the period of greatest interest in Altai. In 1928–1929 M.P. Gryaznov published several articles that examined the peculiarity of the Altai mounds, in which permafrost was found that preserved organic materials. In 1930, he pointed out the possibility of establishing the relative age of ancient mounds from the wood preserved in them, based on the well-known fact that the size and type of annual tree rings depend on the climatic features of a particular year (Gryaznov M.P., 1930a) . Probably, such an approach to the study of archaeological material was developed under the influence of S.A. Teploukhov, who gave great importance influence of the ecological situation on cultural and historical processes (Shevchenko O.V., 1992, p. 79; Bobrov V.V., 1994, p. 74; Kiryushin Yu.F., Tishkin A.A., 1997, p. 12 ). Influence scientific heritage S.A. Teploukhov can also be traced in other publications by M.P. Gryaznov. So, in his work “Ancient Cultures of Altai” (Gryaznov M.P., 1930b), he, relying on previously known materials, using the periodizations proposed by V.V. Radlov (Marsadolov L.S., 1996a, p. 20) and S.A. Teploukhov (1929) for Southern Siberia, drew on the results of new archaeological data and developed a schematic construction of the Altai culture change, subdividing the sites of this region into seven main stages. In this article, the scientist provided the first summary of the discovered specific things that served as the basis for the formation of ideas about the development of ancient society at the turn of the eras (bronze and iron). In the proposed M.P. Dirty division schematically defines the sequence of changing cultures without specific chronological references. For a more perfect periodization, there were not enough single and random finds. We needed mass material reflecting various aspects of people's life. Nevertheless, the first experience of periodization of the archaeological sites of Altai, proposed by the researcher in 1930, is considered one of the important results of his work (Avanesova N.I., Kyzlasov L.R., 1985) and has not lost its significance to this day (Kiryushin Yu.F., Tishkin A.A., 1997, pp. 12–13).

In April 1930, in the sector of the archaic formation of the GAIMK, a small research group, called IKS by the first letters of the words meaning the problem of study: the history of nomadic pastoralism (Artamonov M.I., 1977, p. 4; Zhuk A.V., 1997, p. 53–54). This scientific team included V.V. Holmsten (team leader), M.I. Artamonov, G.P. Sosnovsky and M.P. Gryaznov. Despite the fact that this group existed only until the autumn of 1931 (Zhuk A.V., 1997, p. 57), nevertheless, important conclusions were obtained by it and further directions were laid for the development of nomadic studies in general. The most significant results of the work of scientists was the recognition historical fact that before the dominance of the nomadic pastoral economy in the steppes of Eurasia, a complex agricultural and pastoral settled economy flourished in them. In addition, it was found that the nomadic economy arises only at the end of the Bronze Age and is finally established during the period of the spread of iron in the Scythian-Sarmatian cultures (Artamonov M.I., 1977, p. 4).

The concept created with the participation of M.P. Gryaznov, was reflected in the subsequent works of the researcher. In 1939, he wrote the paragraph "Early nomads of Western Siberia and Kazakhstan" for the collective work "History of the USSR from ancient times to the formation of the Old Russian state" (Gryaznov MP, 1939). In this work, relying on archaeological data from the Altai and adjacent territories, Mikhail Petrovich introduced into the scientific terminology the concept of the formational nature of the "era of early nomads", which spanned eight centuries (7th century BC - 1st century AD). .) and was divided into three stages: 1) Mayemir (7th–5th centuries BC; 2) Pazyryk (5th–3rd centuries BC); 3) Shibinsky (II century BC - I century AD). Archaeological materials characterizing each of the stages, according to the researcher, made it possible to “track successive changes in the economic and social life of the tribes” throughout the era of the early nomads (Gryaznov MP, 1939, p. 400). In fact, M.P. Gryaznov did not make a fundamental terminological difference between the concepts of "the era of early nomads" and "the culture of early nomads". From this it follows that in Gorny Altai throughout the Scythian era, in the view of the scientist, there was one culture that went through the above three stages in its development. In this regard, the researcher noted that “the monuments of the Mayemir stage represent the same culture (the culture of the early nomads of Altai. - Auth.), which is familiar from the monuments of the Pazyryk and Shiba stages” (Gryaznov M.P., 1947, p. 9–11) .

In the work of 1939, M.P. Gryaznov gave in in general terms description of each of the identified stages. Thus, the main features of the Mayemir stage were the burial of a horse in a separate special pit, next to the main grave of a buried person. The monuments of this stage included burial mounds in the Mayemir steppe, objects excavated under Solonechny Belok on Kuyum. The second, Pazyryk stage, was characterized by such innovations in culture as mastering the technique of forging iron tools and weapons, the accompanying burial of a horse in the same grave with the deceased, and the manufacture of weapons from bronze of reduced sizes especially for burial. The scientist attributed the burial mounds in Pazyryk, Tuekta and others to the Pazyryk stage. Finally, the largest number of sites belonged to the third, Shiba stage: Berel, Tuekta, Kurai, Katanda, Shiba. M.P. Gryaznov noted that “the funeral ritual in the barrows and the composition of the objects placed in the grave” remained the same as at the Pazyryk stage. However, bronze tools and weapons completely disappeared, which were replaced by objects made of iron. The exception was bronze arrowheads of the Late Scythian type. It was emphasized that iron weapons retained the shape of bronze ones, and horn decorations became numerous and varied (Gryaznov MP, 1939, pp. 407–408). According to L.S. Marsadolov, this work by M.P. Gryaznova demonstrated the final methodological transition of the scientist to the position of historical materialism. Now changes in the development of the economy began to be considered in close connection with changes in the social system, ideological ideas, art, and so on. (Marsadolov L.S., 1996a, p. 26).

Developing his ideas, M.P. On July 5, 1945, Gryaznov made a report “Monuments of the Mayemir stage of the era of early nomads in Altai” at a meeting of the Bronze and Early Iron Sector of the IIMK, which was later published in expanded form (Gryaznov MP, 1947). Monuments of the Mayemir stage (7th-5th centuries BC) he proposed to single out on the basis of three main features: 1) the design of the bridle (with stirrup-shaped bits and three-hole cheek-pieces); 2) the shape of bronze mirrors with a vertical wall-rim along the edge and a loop in the form of a flat semicircle in the middle; 3) the complete absence of iron tools (all bronze tools have shapes close to those of Karasuk). This time, the scientist attributed to the monuments of this stage burial mounds and a treasure in the Mayemir steppe, burials near Solonechny Belok, burials in Ust-Kuyum, a complex of bronze objects from riding horse equipment discovered near Zmeinogorsk, two more such sets from the Semipalatinsk Museum, as well as random finds . Among the features that characterize given period, the researcher indicated the following: the presence of a horse in a separate grave, the archaism of the “animal style”, the absence of pottery, the economic and social differentiation of society, the cattle-breeding form of the economy (Gryaznov MP, 1947, p. 9–14). Almost ten years later, M.P. Gryaznov, relying on the results of his excavations in the Near Elbans, narrowed the date of the Mayemir stage to the 7th–6th centuries. BC. In addition, he pointed out the difference and similarity between the Mayemir monuments of the Altai Mountains and the Bolsherechensky Upper Ob, which he previously referred to the same “culture of the early nomads” of Altai (Gryaznov M.P., 1956, pp. 44–98).

After the excavations of the Arzhan mound in Tuva, archaeologists faced quite a few problems, some of which naturally fell on the shoulders of M.P. Gryaznova (Kiryushin Yu.F., Tishkin A.A., 1997, pp. 19–20). In 1978, the scientist outlines his concept of the formation of cultures of the Scythian-Siberian type, developing the ideas formulated in a number of previous works (Gryaznov MP, 1975a–c). At the same time, he noted that "... the initial stage of the Scythian culture (VIII-VII centuries BC) ... is known not only in the Black Sea region and Tuva", but also in Altai. Among the monuments of this stage, which also precedes the Mayemir one, are “a few burials ... in the burial grounds of Kurtu and Ust-Kuyum”. Concluding the consideration of the question posed, M.P. Gryaznov (1978, pp. 17–18) makes the most important conclusion for all Scythology that “in the vast expanses of Eurasia from the 8th century. BC. cultures of the Scytho-Siberian type, similar in general terms, synchronously arise and develop, which had features of originality and originality due to special conditions of existence. This approach implements the idea of ​​polycentrism in explaining the process of formation of the Scythian-Siberian community in the vast expanses of Eurasia. Later, M.P. Gryaznov identified three phases in the development of cultures of the 8th–3rd centuries. BC: 1) Arzhan-Chernogorovskaya (VIII-VII centuries BC); 2) Mayemir-Kelermes (7th-6th centuries BC); 3) Pazyryk-Chertomlyk (V-III centuries BC). Each phase was characterized archaeologically by the features of the Scythian triad: weapons, animal style, horse equipment (Gryaznov MP, 1979, pp. 4–7). In 1983, in one of his last published works, M.P. Gryaznov again turned to the problem of isolating initial stage Scythian-Siberian cultures, dated as early as the 9th–7th centuries. BC. Describing the monuments of the Arzhan-Chernogorov phase in Altai as one of the cultural and historical regions identified by him, M.P. Gryaznov pointed out that this region undoubtedly passed such a stage of development and had its own originality in culture. However, archaeological materials, in his opinion, were still insufficient to justify such a stage in relation to the Altai (Gryaznov MP, 1983, p. 9). Completing short review cultural and chronological concept of M.P. Gryaznov, it can be noted that the phases identified by him in their content corresponded to the stage approach developed by scientists in the 1st half of the 20th century. Therefore, the archaeologist's attempts to fill the "old" theoretical principles of research with new archaeological material led to certain methodological and cultural-historical contradictions. The ideas expressed were not picked up and practically did not find reflection in the works of followers. However, despite this, the contribution of M.P. Gryaznov to science is undoubtedly significant, and the peculiarities of the approach to interpreting sources are quite consistent with the traditions of the Soviet era and the level of accumulation of materials on the identified problems. It is possible that there will be a return to the concept of the researcher and it will be filled with new content.

It should be noted that in addition to studying the cultural and chronological aspects of the Scythian era of Gorny Altai, M.P. Gryaznov paid some attention to other issues of the development of the culture of nomads. Back in 1939 M.P. Gryaznov noted that the “era of the early nomads” of Altai was characterized by the “decomposition” of the primitive communal system, the emergence of social differentiation and slavery in the Late Scythian period. Taking into account the peculiarities of the funeral rite of the nomads of the Altai Mountains of the Scythian time, he identified three groups of mounds corresponding to the social status of the buried: 1) poor; 2) richer (middle); 3) huge kurums (Gryaznov M.P., 1939, pp. 407–411). A little later, the scientist noted that in this era, the nomads had not only developed social differentiation, but also a complex political structure of society. This was expressed, in particular, in the dominance of nomadic pastoralists over settled pastoral and agricultural groups of the population (Gryaznov MP, 1947, pp. 14–15).

Valuable material for paleosocial reconstructions by M.P. Gryaznov received after excavations of the First Pazyryk mound. Taking into account the monumentality of the structure, as well as an insignificant percentage of large mounds in relation to small ones, the researcher determined the status of the person buried in this mound as a “tribal leader”. The development of social relations in the Pazyryk society, according to the scientist, was evidenced by the fact that he established that wealth and the highest public positions in the clan and tribe were inherited (Gryaznov MP, 1950, p. 68–69). Having carefully studied the burial materials, first of all, the accompanying burials of horses, M.P. Gryaznov made the assumption that "these were gifts to the tribal leader from ten clan masters." He also believed that the practice of offering existed in Everyday life, which was the "norm of economic relations" between the mass of the main producers and officials in the clan and tribe (Gryaznov MP, 1950, p. 69–71). Based on these conclusions, M.P. Gryaznov tried to reconstruct the composition of the "Pazyryk" society according to the number of clan rulers who brought gifts to the leaders. As a result, according to his calculations, it turned out that the tribe, whose leader was buried in the First Pazyryk mound, consisted of 10 clans, in the second - from 7, in the third and fourth - from 14, in the Berel kurgan - from 16, in the Shibinsky - out of 14. At the same time, the scientist considered the numbers 7 and 14 not to be accidental, but to testify to the fratrial division of the “Pazyryks”, which was feature all peoples who were at the stage of military democracy (Ibid.).

Did not disregard M.P. Gryaznov and the study of the worldview and art of the Altai nomads. He analyzed in sufficient detail the Pazyryk images and plots, which were decorative and ornamental in nature. At the same time, the researcher pointed out that the art of the nomads of the region under consideration “was enriched ... with artistic images ... and stylistic devices borrowed from more distant foreign cultural peoples, from peoples ancient China and Iran” (Gryaznov M.P., Bulgakov A.P., 1958, pp. 10–11). However, if the borrowing of motifs and techniques of Chinese art of the Zhan-guo and Han periods was not widespread in the art of the ancient Altai tribes, then the influence of Iran and Central Asia on the development of artistic traditions was much more significant. Moreover, the influence of the art of the states of the Near East and Central Asia was reflected both in the nature of ornamental motifs, stylistic devices, as well as on the mythological content artistic images(Gryaznov M.P., 1950, p. 72–85; Gryaznov M.P., Bulgakov A.P., 1958, p. 7–14).

Considering the mythology of the nomads, M.P. Gryaznov made an assumption about the existence of their ideas about the three-level structure of the world (heaven, earth, underworld), which are somewhat similar to the views of the Altaians. All three parts of the Universe were correlated in antiquity with specific mythical creatures: a winged tiger and an eagle - with the sky, a fish-like monster, a serpent - with the underworld, and the rest of the characters inhabited the earth. Each of the mythical creatures had a degree of power and strength (Gryaznov MP, 1950, p. 82). The existence of the Gorny Altai pastoralists' ideas about the three-level structure of the universe was to a certain extent justified by subsequent researchers (Kubarev V.D., 1991; Polosmak N.V., 1997, 2001a; Dashkovsky P.K., 1997, 2002; etc.) .

Describing the worldview of the nomads, M.P. Gryaznov noted that there were ideas about zoomorphic mythical creatures that rule the world in the previous Karasuk era. From the Mayemir stage, images of these animals began to be placed not only on weapons, but also on items of personal attire and horse equipment. According to the scientist, the content of art was significantly influenced by the features of the existence and life of the nomadic society itself. Since in the era of military democracy, the most courageous and strongest warrior, military leader, powerful family, clan, tribe comes to the fore in the struggle, a similar situation was reflected in mythology. These mythical creatures, as pointed out by M.P. Gryaznov, "were the embodiment of strength, power and inaccessibility ...", and their "relationships were determined by the struggle, the invariable outcome of which was the brutal reprisal of the strong with his victim" (Gryaznov MP, 1950, p. 82). Without touching the content side of this hypothesis, M.P. Gryaznov, one should only pay attention to the possible methodological validity of such arguments of the archaeologist. It's about that in 1930 the work of the famous Russian philosopher A.F. Losev "Dialectics of Myth". True, the book was soon banned, and the philosopher himself was arrested and sent to camps, but, nevertheless, she managed to get on store shelves and attract the attention of scientific circles (Takho-Godi A.A., 1991). One of the conclusions reached by A.F. Losev, was that mythology reflects social life (ancient mythology reflects the life of the family, etc.) (Losev A.F., 1994). It is possible that M.P. Gryaznov was familiar with these developments by A.F. Losev. In any case, in his work on the interpretation of the mythological plots of the Altai nomads (interpretation of the interaction of mythical characters by analogy with the life of a nomadic society), one can catch the similarity with the features of the approach to mythology developed by A.F. Losev.

It is important to note once again that M.P. Gryaznov, like most researchers of that time, was influenced by the stage theory of the development of societies developed by N.Ya. Marr. With regard to the reconstruction of the religious and mythological system of the “Pazyryks”, this was reflected in the fact that M.P. Gryaznov, following N.Ya. Marr (1926, 1929), L.A. Potapov (1935) tried, on the basis of materials from the First Pazyryk mound, to identify the remnants of totemism among the pastoralists of the Altai Mountains. According to these scientists, the deer masks that adorned the horses from this mound testified that in ancient times the leading role in the economy and in religion belonged not to the horse, but to the deer (Gryaznov M.P., 1950, pp. 84–85).

Concluding the consideration of the creative heritage of M.P. Gryaznov in the field of Scythology, it should be noted that some of the scientist's ideas were further developed in the scientific activities of his students, many of whom began to study the Scythian era of Eurasia. Among associates, students and pupils of M.P. Gryaznov can be noted A.D. Gracha, Ya.A. Shera, M.N. Pshenitsyn, K.A. Akisheva, A.M. Orazbaeva, M.K. Kadyrbaeva, M.Kh. Mannai-Oola, L.S. Marsadolova, N.A. Bokovenko and many others.

Lua error in Module:CategoryForProfession on line 52: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).

Rice. 5. North Caucasus. Weapons and some other items:
1, 2, 19-21 - Koban burial ground; 3-5, 7, 8, 10-12, 14, 18 - a burial ground near a furniture factory; 6 - Berezovsky burial ground; 9, 13 - Sultangor burial ground; 15 - the village of Kuban; 16 - burial ground "Industry" No. 1; 17 - Echkivash burial ground.
(1-2 - tusk of a wild boar; 3-5, 7, 8, 13-16, 19-21 - bronze; 17-18 - silver).

, Tobolsk Governorate, Russian Empire

Citizenship:

USSR USSR

Date of death:
Spouse:

Gryaznova Maria Nikolaevna

Awards and prizes:
Mikhail Petrovich Gryaznov

Thumbnail creation error: File not found


M. Gryaznov in 1922
historian, archaeologist, anthropologist
Name at birth:

Lua error in Module:Wikidata on line 170: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).

Occupation:

Lua error in Module:Wikidata on line 170: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).

Date of Birth:
Citizenship:

USSR 22x20px USSR

Citizenship:

Lua error in Module:Wikidata on line 170: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).

Country:

Lua error in Module:Wikidata on line 170: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).

Date of death:
Father:

Lua error in Module:Wikidata on line 170: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).

Mother:

Lua error in Module:Wikidata on line 170: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).

Spouse:

Lua error in Module:Wikidata on line 170: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).

Spouse:

Gryaznova Maria Nikolaevna

Children:

Lua error in Module:Wikidata on line 170: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).

Awards and prizes:
Autograph:

Lua error in Module:Wikidata on line 170: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).

Website:

Lua error in Module:Wikidata on line 170: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).

Miscellaneous:

Lua error in Module:Wikidata on line 170: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).

Lua error in Module:Wikidata on line 170: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).
[[Lua error in Module:Wikidata/Interproject on line 17: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value). |Artworks]] in Wikisource

Mikhail Petrovich Gryaznov(March 13, 1902, Berezov, Tobolsk province, Russia - August 18, 1987, Leningrad, USSR) - Soviet historian, archaeologist, anthropologist.

Biography

Mikhail Gryaznov was born into the family of a city school inspector. He graduated from the 2nd real school in Tomsk, in 1919 he entered the natural department of the Physics and Mathematics Faculty of Tomsk University. In the summer of 1920, while rafting along the Yenisei with a classmate, also a future ethnographer, Evgeny Shneider, he met archaeologist Sergei Teploukhov, who was excavating near the village of Bateni. From this casual acquaintance, Gryaznov began his passion for archeology.

On November 29, 1933, Gryaznov, like many of his colleagues, including Teploukhov, was arrested in the case of the "Russian National Party" ("Case of the Slavists"). He was sentenced to three years of exile in Vyatka. After returning to Leningrad in 1937, he worked in the Hermitage. During the war, Gryaznov lived in evacuation in Sverdlovsk, where he defended his candidate (January 1945) and doctoral (June of the same year) dissertations.

After the end of the war, he returned to Leningrad again, worked in the Hermitage and (head of the sector of Central Asia and the Caucasus). In 1956, the scientist was rehabilitated. Gryaznov continued to actively engage in science until the end of his life, went on expeditions. In particular, in 1971-1974, he excavated the early Scythian mound Arzhan (VIII-VII centuries BC), and came up with a hypothesis about the Asian origin of the Scythian culture.

The main scientific works are devoted to the study of the activities, culture and economic way of life of nomads in the territory of modern Kazakhstan, Central Asia and Western Siberia in the Bronze Age, the history of the Saks, Massagets and Usuns.

Awards

Compositions

Write a review on the article "Gryaznov, Mikhail Petrovich"

Notes

Links

  • Tikhonov I. L.

An excerpt characterizing Gryaznov, Mikhail Petrovich

But soon, after some six months, good news came to them - mom was pregnant again ... Dad was frightened at first, but seeing that mom suddenly began to revive very quickly, he decided to take risks, and now everyone is looking forward to they were expecting a second child... This time they were very careful, and tried in every possible way to protect their mother from any unwanted accidents. But, unfortunately, trouble, apparently for some reason, fell in love with this hospitable door ... And she knocked again ...
With a fright, knowing the sad story of my mother's first pregnancy, and fearing that something would go “wrong” again, the doctors decided to perform a “caesarean section” even before the contractions began (!). And apparently they did it too early ... One way or another, a girl was born, who was named Marianna. But, unfortunately, she also managed to live for a very short time - after three days this fragile, slightly blossoming life, for unknown reasons, was interrupted ...
There was a terrible impression that someone really did not want her mother to give birth at all ... And although by nature and genetics she was a strong and absolutely suitable woman for childbearing, she was already afraid to even think about repeating such a cruel attempt once generally...
But man is a creature, surprisingly strong, and is able to endure much more than he himself could ever imagine ... Well, pain, even the most terrible, (if it does not immediately break the heart) is once visible blunted, forced out, eternally living in each of us, hope. That is why, exactly one year later, very easily and without any complications, in the early December morning, another daughter was born to the Seryogin family, and I turned out to be this happy daughter ... But ... and this birth would certainly have ended differently happily, if everything continued to happen according to the pre-prepared plan of our “compassionate” doctors ... On a cold December morning, my mother was taken to the hospital, even before she had contractions, in order, again, to “be sure” that “ nothing bad will happen (!!!) ... Dad, wildly nervous from "bad feelings", rushed back and forth along the long hospital corridor, unable to calm down, because he knew that, according to their common agreement, mom did such try for the last time and if something happens to the child this time, it means that they will never be destined to see their children ... The decision was difficult, but dad preferred to see, if not children, then at least his beloved " asterisk "alive, and not bury all his family at once, even in our standing still without understanding what it really means - his family ...
To my father’s great regret, Dr. Ingelyavichus, who was still the chief surgeon there, again came to check on my mother, and it was very, very difficult to avoid his “high” attention ... Having “carefully” examined my mother, Ingelyavichus announced that he would come tomorrow at 6 o'clock in the morning, to give mom another "caesarean section", for which poor dad almost had a heart attack ...
But about five o'clock in the morning, a very pleasant young midwife came to my mother and, much to my mother's surprise, cheerfully said:
- Well, let's get ready, now we will give birth!
When the frightened mother asked - what about the doctor? The woman, calmly looking into her eyes, affectionately replied that, in her opinion, it was high time for her mother to give birth to live (!) Children ... And she began to gently and carefully massage her mother’s stomach, as if gradually preparing her for a “soon and happy” childbearing ... And now, with light hand to this wonderful unknown midwife, at about six o'clock in the morning, my mother easily and quickly gave birth to her first living child, which, fortunately, turned out to be me.
- Well, look at this doll, mom! - the midwife exclaimed merrily, bringing her mother already washed and clean, a small screaming bundle. And the mother, seeing for the first time her, alive and healthy, little daughter ... fainted with joy ...

When exactly at six o'clock in the morning Dr. Ingelyavichus entered the ward, a wonderful picture appeared before his eyes - a very happy couple was lying on the bed - it was my mother and me, her living newborn daughter ... But instead of being glad for such an unexpected happy the end, the doctor for some reason went into a real rage and, without saying a word, jumped out of the ward ...
We never found out what really happened with all the "tragically unusual" births of my poor, suffering mother. But one thing was clear for sure - someone really did not want at least one mother's child to be born alive into this world. But apparently the one who so carefully and reliably protected me all my later life, this time he decided to prevent the death of the Seregins' child, somehow knowing that he would certainly be the last in this family ...
This is how, “with obstacles,” my amazing and unusual life, the appearance of which, even before my birth, was preparing for me, even then quite complicated and unpredictable, fate ....
Or maybe it was someone who then already knew that my life would be needed by someone and for something, and someone tried very hard so that I was still born on this earth, despite all the “heavy obstacles...

As time went. My tenth winter already completely dominated the yard, covering everything around with a snow-white fluffy cover, as if wanting to show that a full-fledged mistress on this moment she is here.
More and more people entered the stores to stock up on New Year's gifts in advance, and even the air already "smelled" of the holiday.
Two of my favorite days were approaching - my birthday and New Year, between which there was only a two-week difference, which allowed me to fully enjoy their "celebration", without any big break ...
For days on end I was spinning “in reconnaissance” near my grandmother, trying to find out what I would get on my “special” day this year? .. But for some reason my grandmother did not give in, although before it had never been difficult for me to “melt” her silence even before my birthday and find out what kind of "pleasure" I can expect. But this year, for some reason, to all my “hopeless” attempts, my grandmother only smiled mysteriously and answered that it was a “surprise”, and that she was absolutely sure that I would like it very much. So, no matter how hard I tried, she held firm and did not succumb to any provocations. There was nowhere to go - I had to wait ...

Mikhail Petrovich Gryaznov(March 13, 1902, Berezov, Tobolsk province, Russia - August 18, 1987, Leningrad, USSR) - Soviet historian, archaeologist, anthropologist.

Biography

Mikhail Gryaznov was born into the family of a city school inspector. He graduated from the 2nd real school in Tomsk, in 1919 he entered the natural department of the Physics and Mathematics Faculty of Tomsk University. In the summer of 1920, while rafting down the Yenisei with a classmate, also a future ethnographer, Yevgeny Shneider, he met archaeologist Sergei Teploukhov, who was excavating near the village of Bateni. From this casual acquaintance, Gryaznov began his passion for archeology.

Under the leadership of Sergei Rudenko and Sergei Teploukhov, he worked at Tomsk University, in the spring of 1922 a group of scientists (Gryaznov, Teploukhov, Rudenko, Schneider) moved to Petrograd. Gryaznov transferred to Petrograd University, which he never graduated from (1925), worked at the Academy of the History of Material Culture. He conducted excavations near Tomsk, led expeditions to South Siberia and Kazakhstan, and in 1929 excavated the Pazyryk mound in the Altai Mountains.

On November 29, 1933, Gryaznov, like many of his colleagues, including Teploukhov, was arrested in the case of the "Russian National Party" ("The Case of the Slavists"). He was sentenced to three years of exile in Vyatka. After returning to Leningrad in 1937, he worked in the Hermitage. During the war, Gryaznov lived in evacuation in Sverdlovsk, where he defended his candidate (January 1945) and doctoral (June of the same year) dissertations.

After the end of the war, he returned to Leningrad again, worked in the Hermitage and the Institute of the History of Material Culture (head of the sector of Central Asia and the Caucasus). In 1956, the scientist was rehabilitated. Gryaznov continued to actively engage in science until the end of his life, went on expeditions. In particular, in 1971-1974, he excavated the Arzhan mound (VIII-VII centuries BC) in Tuva, and came up with a hypothesis about the Asian origin of the Scythian culture.

The main scientific works are devoted to the study of the activities, culture and economic way of life of nomads in the territory of modern Kazakhstan, Central Asia and Western Siberia in the Bronze Age, the history of the Sakas, Massagets and Usuns.

Awards

Laureate of the State Prize of the USSR for 1983. He was awarded the Order of the Badge of Honor.

Compositions

  • The prehistoric past of Altai: (The work of the Altai expedition of the State Russian Museum in 1924-25) // Nature. 1926. No. 9/10. pp. 97-98;
  • Stone statues of the Minusinsk steppes // (The work of the Altai expedition of the State Russian Museum in 1924-25) // Nature. 1926. No. 11/12. pp. 100-105 (together with E. R. Schneider);
  • Burials of the Bronze Age in Western Kazakhstan // Cossacks: Materials of OKISAR. 1927. Issue 2. S. 172-221;
  • Excavation of a princely grave in Altai // Man. 1928. No. 2/4. pp. 217-219;
  • Ancient statues of the Minusinsk steppes // ME. 1929. Vol. 4, no. 2. - L., 1929. S. 63-96 (together with E. R. Schneider);
  • Pazyryk princely burial in Altai // Nature. 1929. No. 11. S. 973-984;
  • Kazakhstan hearth bronze culture// Cossacks: Materials OKISAR. 1930. Issue 3. S. 149-162;
  • Gold of East Kazakhstan and Altai // Archaeological work of the Academy of Sciences on new buildings in 1932-33. - M, 1935
  • Pazyryk barrow. - L., 1937 (with parallel French text);
  • Ancient Bronze of the Minusinsk Steppes // Proceedings of the Department of History primitive culture State Hermitage. 1941. T. 1. S. 237-271;
  • The first Pazyryk burial mound. - L., 1950;
  • ancient art Altai. - L., 1958;
  • Tagar culture // History of Siberia. - L., 1968. T. 1. S. 159-165, 180-196;
  • Miniatures of the Tashtyk culture // Archaeological collection of the Hermitage. Issue 13. - L., 1971. S. 94-106;
  • Arzhan - the royal mound of the early Scythian time. - L., 1980;
  • The initial phase of the development of the Scythian-Siberian cultures // Archeology of Southern Siberia. Kemerovo, 1983;
  • Sibirie du Sud. Geneve, 1969 (French, German and English edition) // Archaeologia Mundi.